Skip to main content

Localized Routing for Proxy Mobile IPv6
draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-10

Yes

(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-05-07)
Having ploughed through the wdiff for the latest revision, and looking at the email thread between Suresh and Les, I believe all of my Discuss issues have been resolved. Thanks for the work.

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-06-05)
I've cleared my Discuss position and thanks for reconciling my concerns.

1. Fixed.

2. Fixed.

3. Fixed.

4. In section 4.1, does "LR state of the MAG" refer to the state in the
LMA?  Also, is pMAG == MAG?

5. Fixed.

6. In section 10.1, "for now" is unnecessary.  Why is the alignment
requirement mentioned here and not for the definitions in section 9?

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-02-29 for -08)
- LR with two MAGs implies that MAG1 knows that MAG2 is the CN's 
location at the granularity of the MAG (MAG2) with which the CN
is associated.. Since there is a way for a MAG to initiate this 
then a bad or compromised MAG could attempt to track any CN 
for which LR is enabled who's address the bad MAG knows. That 
is a privacy problem for the CN's. I noted this about the DIME WG 
equivalent draft and the authors of tha suggested that text as per 
the above would be better in this document. I'm not sure there's
a mitigation here really but I'd say its worth noting at least.

- Figures 1 and 2 have no real caption and aren't referred to
from the text so are less useful than they could be.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)