Localized Routing for Proxy Mobile IPv6
draft-ietf-netext-pmip-lr-10
Yes
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-07)
Unknown
Having ploughed through the wdiff for the latest revision, and looking at the email thread between Suresh and Les, I believe all of my Discuss issues have been resolved. Thanks for the work.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-06-05)
Unknown
I've cleared my Discuss position and thanks for reconciling my concerns. 1. Fixed. 2. Fixed. 3. Fixed. 4. In section 4.1, does "LR state of the MAG" refer to the state in the LMA? Also, is pMAG == MAG? 5. Fixed. 6. In section 10.1, "for now" is unnecessary. Why is the alignment requirement mentioned here and not for the definitions in section 9?
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-29 for -08)
Unknown
- LR with two MAGs implies that MAG1 knows that MAG2 is the CN's location at the granularity of the MAG (MAG2) with which the CN is associated.. Since there is a way for a MAG to initiate this then a bad or compromised MAG could attempt to track any CN for which LR is enabled who's address the bad MAG knows. That is a privacy problem for the CN's. I noted this about the DIME WG equivalent draft and the authors of tha suggested that text as per the above would be better in this document. I'm not sure there's a mitigation here really but I'd say its worth noting at least. - Figures 1 and 2 have no real caption and aren't referred to from the text so are less useful than they could be.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08)
Unknown