Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 2 External Data Representation Standard (XDR) Description
draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-41

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 39 and is now closed.

(Martin Stiemerling) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-14 for -40)
No email
send info
To be honest, I can't offer much commentary on the 80 odd pages of XDR. I note that the sheperd's writeup says "“Verified XDR provided in documents is appropriate and aligns with XDR syntax and standards.”  I'm not sure if that means manually verified or mechanically verified. (Hopefully the latter.)

The IANA considerations delegate to [I-D.ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2]. But the IANA section there only contains a reference to RFC 7569. Maybe this draft could directly reference the RFC, or just say "No IANA considerations."?

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-20 for -40)
No email
send info
My rate of number of pages reviewed per hour for this telechat just increased significantly. 
All those lines starting with /// are comments and should not be read, right :-)
Kidding apart, I can only guess that the XDR is fine

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-20 for -40)
No email
send info
Thank you for making the relationship between 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 very clear in this document!

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-20 for -40)
No email
send info
I am in the same boat as Ben WRT reviewing XDR code. Given the description in the shepherd report, I trust the WG and AD have done the right thing.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection