Network File System (NFS) Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Problem Statement
draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-08
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Sam Hartman)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-11-15)
Unknown
I'm voting no objection, but support Tim's discuss on the security considerations. Two pieces of advice: * A reference to the security considerations of RFC 4297 from the security considerations section of this document may be about a 70% solution. * When NFS requires security, I understand GSS/Kerberos is one mechanism that is at least widely implemented and may be used more than NFS+IPsec. A discussion similar to the ones in RFC 4297 for IPsec and TLS would be helpful to understand the impact of the GSS/Kerberos mechanism on RDMA. If you need help with such text, I recommend asking Nicolas Williams for help.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-11-13)
Unknown
I have not seen a response to the Last Call comments raised by Sandy Murphy in her SecDir Review.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown