Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Security Version 3
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-17

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.

(Stephen Farrell) Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty) Yes

Comment (2016-01-06 for -14)
No email
send info
Thanks for clearing up the sentences discussed in the SecDir review in your next version:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06302.html

(Martin Stiemerling) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-05 for -14)
No email
send info
Hi just a couple of comments:

- 2.7.1.4:
rp_name is labeled "human readable". Are there internationalization considerations?

-5:
It would be nice to see the IANA request details in this draft

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-07 for -15)
No email
send info
victor kuarsingh performed to opsdir review resulting in v15, no objections.

Barry Leiba No Objection

Comment (2016-01-06 for -14)
No email
send info
I have the same question as Ben does about rp_name: nothing is said about it other than "human readable".  Can we have a brief discussion about this?

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection