NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP) for Quality-of-Service Signaling
draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-18
Yes
(Magnus Westerlund)
No Objection
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Lars Eggert)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-01-21)
Unknown
One note: As an experimental RFC, I was very impressed by the thought put into the security considerations. Reviewing the security implications of different models is really helpful to the reader. However, if this document was being considered for standards track, I would have asked for text describing which GIST features were required to meet the various security considerations. To be clear, I am not asking for any changes. I just want to avoid unwelcome surprises in the case of a successful experiment and resubmission for standards track.