Skip to main content

Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6
draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-06

Yes

(Jari Arkko)
(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Lars Eggert)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2010-01-07) Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-08-27) Unknown
I support the DISCUSSes by Russ and Adrian concerning the relationship with RFC 4705.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-08-27) Unknown
I agree with Russ that this document should have a paragraph explaining
its relationship to RFC 4075 (which is being obsoleted by this
document), describing briefly why RFC 4075 is obsoleted (and what is
added here), and saying that the use of RFC 4075 is no longer
recommended.

Glen Zorn's SecDir review also identified a number of places that
would benefit from some clarification of the text, and provided
editorial comments that should be taken into account.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-08-25) Unknown
  As pointed out in the Gen-ART Review by Sean Turner on 2009-08-12:

  In section 4: s/To to enable/To enable/
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-08-26) Unknown
In addition to identifying items (2a) and (3) above, Glen Zorn's (late) secdir review dated
August 24 provides some suggested wording changes.  I would encourage the authors 
to review Glen's suggestions and incorporate those that they find helpful.