Skip to main content

BFD for Geneve
draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-13

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve@ietf.org, matthew.bocci@nokia.com, nvo3-chairs@ietf.org, nvo3@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Protocol Action: 'BFD for Geneve' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-13.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'BFD for Geneve'
  (draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-13.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Network Virtualization Overlays Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Jim Guichard, Andrew Alston and John Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document describes the use of the Bidirectional Forwarding
   Detection (BFD) protocol in point-to-point Generic Network
   Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve) unicast tunnels used to make up
   an overlay network.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

Broad consensus was found in the working group for this document.

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

The are numerous known implementations of BFD over tunnels e.g. MPLS LSPs, and
there are known implementations of Geneve. Although there is no formal record
of implementations of BFD over Geneve, this draft does not make any changes to
the BFD state machine and simply describes how it should be encapsulated.
Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Matthew Bocci. The
   Responsible Area Director is Andrew Alston.

RFC Editor Note