NVO3 Gap Analysis - Requirements Versus Available Technology Choices
draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (nvo3 WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (latest revision 2014-02-14) | ||
| Replaces | draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Parked WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Benson Schliesser | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis-01.txt
Abstract
This document evaluates candidate protocols against the NVO3 requirements. Gaps are identified and further work recommended.
Authors
Eric Gray
(Eric.Gray@Ericsson.com)
Nabil Bitar
(nabil.bitar@verizon.com)
Xiaoming Chen
(ming.chen@huawei.com)
Marc Lasserre
(marc.lasserre@alcatel-lucent.com)
Tina Tsou
(tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)