Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents
draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2005-03-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-03-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-03-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-03-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-03-18
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-18
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2005-03-18 from 2005-03-14 |
2005-03-18
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Note field has been cleared by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-18
|
04 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-03-17 |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-03-17
|
04 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Mark Townsley |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Minor editorial: > Editor's Note (to be removed prior to publication): Doesn't this need a meta-note indicating that it is NOT … [Ballot comment] Minor editorial: > Editor's Note (to be removed prior to publication): Doesn't this need a meta-note indicating that it is NOT to be removed prior to publication? (at least two occurrences). There appears to be a footnote in section 4.8; I thought the RFC Editor didn't like footnotes. |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. However this document does mention IANA Considerations section guidelines for MIB documents. |
2005-03-17
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-03-16
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] Very informative - will point the mib doctor patients to this before their exams... |
2005-03-16
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-16
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-03-16
|
04 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-03-16
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-03-15
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Nice job. Section 3.4 is very well done. |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2005-03-14 from 2005-02-02 |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-03-17 by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Note]: 'Sorry for being late in putting this on agenda' added by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen |
2005-03-14
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-03-05
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2005-02-02
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-02-02
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-02-02
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2005-02-02 from 2004-03-24 |
2005-02-02
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Last Call was requested by Bert Wijnen |
2005-02-02
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Bert Wijnen |
2005-02-02
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-02-02
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-02-02
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-02-02
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-04.txt |
2004-06-10
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2004-06-10
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-03.txt |
2004-03-24
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen |
2004-03-24
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Various discussion have pointed out that some fixes are still needed. Author has promised to get a new revision in April. |
2004-03-24
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | State Change Notice email list have been change to from |
2004-03-24
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2004-03-24 from 2004-02-06 |
2004-02-06
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | Draft Added by Bert Wijnen |
2003-08-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt |
2003-02-24
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-01.txt |
2003-02-05
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-00.txt |