Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses
draft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-06
Yes
(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-05-26)
Unknown
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-05-06)
Unknown
Is this supposed to update or obsolete RFC 2851? It includes a section describing changes from 2851, but doesn't say anywhere if 2851 is being updated or obsoleted. It _does_ say that 3291 is being obsoleted in the document header, though, so it should probably say something similar for 2851.
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown