%% You should probably cite rfc8549 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-05, number = {draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community/05/}, author = {Zhenqiang Li and Rong Gu and Jie Dong}, title = {{Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)}}, pagetotal = 20, year = 2018, month = mar, day = 5, abstract = {This draft updates RFC7012 IPFIX information model by introducing several information elements (IEs) to enable IPFIX to export the BGP community information, including BGP standard community defined in RFC1997, BGP extended community defined in RFC4360, and BGP large community defined in RFC8092. Network traffic flow information can then be accumulated and analysed at the granularity specified by the BGP communities, which is suitable for and needed by some traffic optimization applications located in IPFIX collector, SDN controller or PCE (Path Computation Element). To clarify, no new BGP community attribute is defined in this document and this document has no purpose to replace BGP Monitoring Protocol BMP defined in RFC7854. The IEs introduced in this document are used by IPFIX together with other IEs to facilitate the IPFIX collector analyzing the traffic in BGP community granularity without running the heavy BGP protocol.}, }