Technical Summary
This document introduces IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
Information Elements to report information contained in the Generic
Packet Radio Service Tunneling Protocol(GTP) User Plane header such
as Tunnel Endpoint Identifier, and data contained in its session
container extension header.
Working Group Summary
Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
For example, was there controversy about particular points
or were there decisions where the consensus was
particularly rough?
From Shepherd's writeup:
No
Document Quality
Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?
From Shepherd's writeup:
There is one implementation status, as mentioned in the "Implementation Status"
section
and
The IPFIX doctors were involved in the development of the draft, and the
feedback collected. Note that they pushed back on the IANA IPFIX information
elements preallocation, since a draft was being presented, and potential
changes could be incorporated.
Personnel
The Document Shepherd for this document is Benoît Claise. The
Responsible Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani.
IANA Note
(Insert IANA Note here or remove section)