An Overview of the IETF Network Management Standards
draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-07
Yes
(Dan Romascanu)
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -06)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-20)
Unknown
Thanks for working through my Discuss
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-15 for -06)
Unknown
(Sorry, timed out so only got to look at the 1st 30 pages or so so far. Looks like a useful doc though.) - Sometimes (e.g. for COPS) you say not to bother (which is good), but other times you don't (e.g. ACAP), which is a pity. I'd have liked consistent editorialisng like that all over the place. (Though I realise it might not be easy, but even knowing "opinions differ" would be useful.) - FCAPS - where is this "outside the IETF" to which you refer on p36? If its not a secret place, be good to be specific.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-21)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my concerns
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-13 for -06)
Unknown
I agree with many of Adrian's DISCUSS points. Other COMMENTs: (1) The last paragraph of section 1.2 should have at least some reference to an I-D or other document to indicate what the authors are talking about (2) Section 3.2 seems odd compared to the rest of the document, as the RFCs mentioned in this section are not management standards; several are just informational RFCs. (3) At the end of Section 3.4, it says that there are two protocols standardized, and then has three bullets underneath. I think the third bullet should be separated out, since its relation to OWAMP and TWAMP is not clearly explained here.