Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers
draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2011-06-30
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2011-06-30
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2011-06-29
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2011-06-28
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. |
2011-06-27
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2011-06-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2011-06-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2011-06-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2011-06-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Approval announcement text regenerated |
2011-06-27
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Scott Kelly. |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | Removed from agenda for telechat |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation. |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Ballot writeup text changed |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded |
2011-06-23
|
02 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-22
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] I suggest that we remove "None" from the author's address. |
2011-06-22
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-21
|
02 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-21
|
02 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-21
|
02 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-21
|
02 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] Typo Section 1 s/and for a a/and for a/ |
2011-06-21
|
02 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded |
2011-06-20
|
02 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-20
|
02 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-20
|
02 | David Harrington | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded |
2011-06-20
|
02 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] Section 5 includes a copyright year of 2010. |
2011-06-20
|
02 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] Section 5 includes a copy right year of 2010. |
2011-06-20
|
02 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-17
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] - A reference to Knuth is always good:-) - Some examples would be even better. |
2011-06-17
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-17
|
02 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Ballot has been issued |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Created "Approve" ballot |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Approval announcement text changed |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Approval announcement text regenerated |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-23 |
2011-06-16
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup. |
2011-06-15
|
02 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2011-06-15
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-02.txt |
2011-06-15
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. |
2011-06-15
|
02 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. |
2011-06-09
|
02 | Amanda Baber | IANA understands that, upon approval of this document there is a single IANA Action that must be completed. In the Network Management Parameters Registry located … IANA understands that, upon approval of this document there is a single IANA Action that must be completed. In the Network Management Parameters Registry located at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers IANA will assign a new SMI number for floatTcMIB is the prefix iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2 as follows: Decimal: tba Name: floatTcMIB Description: FLOAT-TC-MIB Reference: [ RFC-to-be ] IANA understands that this is the only action required upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: … State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: (Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: - 'Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers' as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-06-15. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module containing textual conventions (TCs) to represent floating-point numbers. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Last Call was requested |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation. |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | Last Call text changed |
2011-06-01
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2011-06-01
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2011-06-01
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2011-06-01
|
02 | Dan Romascanu | State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested. |
2011-05-12
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | The Operations Area Working Group has reached consensus on draft- ietf-opsawg-mib-float-01 and are requesting it to be published as an RFC. The RFC 4858 questions/considerations … The Operations Area Working Group has reached consensus on draft- ietf-opsawg-mib-float-01 and are requesting it to be published as an RFC. The RFC 4858 questions/considerations are addressed below: 1a) I will be the shepherd and I have personally reviewed the document and believe it is ready 1b) There has been adequate review both in and out of the WG 1c) I have no concerns in general, nor specifically wrt to AAA, security, XML, etc. 1d) I have no concerns about the content, and no IPR considerations have been raised 1e) There is solid consensus 1f) There has been no extreme discontent 1g) All nit's nitted 1h) no normative references, only informative 1i) The IANA consideration section exists and is consistent 1k) The MIB definition in the document passes automated validation checkers (minus the XXX as a place-holder for the RFC number) Technical Summary This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module containing textual conventions (TCs) to represent floating-point numbers. Working group summary: There was nothing noteworthy in the working group process Any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me in the first instance, or Scott. |
2011-05-12
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | Draft added in state Publication Requested |
2011-05-12
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'Chris Liljenstolpe (ietf@cdl.asgaard.org) is the document shepherd.' added |
2011-04-26
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt |
2011-01-18
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-00.txt |