Skip to main content

Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers
draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2011-06-30
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-06-30
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2011-06-29
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-06-28
02 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-06-27
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-06-27
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-06-27
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-06-27
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-06-27
02 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-06-27
02 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-23
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Scott Kelly.
2011-06-23
02 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-06-23
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2011-06-23
02 Dan Romascanu Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-23
02 Dan Romascanu Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-23
02 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-23
02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-23
02 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-22
02 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
I suggest that we remove "None" from the author's address.
2011-06-22
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-21
02 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-21
02 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-21
02 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-21
02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Typo

Section 1

s/and for a a/and for a/
2011-06-21
02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-20
02 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-20
02 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-20
02 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-20
02 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]


Section 5 includes a copyright year of 2010.

2011-06-20
02 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]


Section 5 includes a copy right year of 2010.

2011-06-20
02 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-17
02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]
- A reference to Knuth is always good:-)
- Some examples would be even better.
2011-06-17
02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-17
02 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu Approval announcement text changed
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-23
2011-06-16
02 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
2011-06-15
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-06-15
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-02.txt
2011-06-15
02 Dan Romascanu State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-06-15
02 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-06-09
02 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document there is a single
IANA Action that must be completed.

In the Network Management Parameters Registry located …
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document there is a single
IANA Action that must be completed.

In the Network Management Parameters Registry located at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers

IANA will assign a new SMI number for floatTcMIB is the prefix

iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2

as follows:

Decimal: tba
Name: floatTcMIB
Description: FLOAT-TC-MIB
Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]

IANA understands that this is the only action required upon approval of
this document.

Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed
until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This
message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.
2011-06-01
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2011-06-01
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2011-06-01
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-06-01
02 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
CC:
Reply-To: …
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
CC:
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call:  (Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area
Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document:
- 'Textual Conventions for the Representation of Floating-Point Numbers'
  as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-06-15. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module
  containing textual conventions (TCs) to represent floating-point
  numbers.




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2011-06-01
02 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested
2011-06-01
02 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-06-01
02 Dan Romascanu Last Call text changed
2011-06-01
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-06-01
02 (System) Last call text was added
2011-06-01
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-06-01
02 Dan Romascanu State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-05-12
02 Cindy Morgan
The Operations Area Working Group has reached consensus on draft-
ietf-opsawg-mib-float-01 and are requesting it to be published as an
RFC. The RFC 4858 questions/considerations …
The Operations Area Working Group has reached consensus on draft-
ietf-opsawg-mib-float-01 and are requesting it to be published as an
RFC. The RFC 4858 questions/considerations are addressed below:
1a) I will be the shepherd and I have personally reviewed the document
and believe it is ready
1b) There has been adequate review both in and out of the WG
1c) I have no concerns in general, nor specifically wrt to AAA,
security, XML, etc.
1d) I have no concerns about the content, and no IPR considerations
have been raised
1e) There is solid consensus
1f) There has been no extreme discontent
1g) All nit's nitted
1h) no normative references, only informative
1i) The IANA consideration section exists and is consistent
1k) The MIB definition in the document passes automated validation
checkers (minus the XXX as a place-holder for the RFC number)

Technical Summary
This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module
containing textual conventions (TCs) to represent floating-point
numbers.

Working group summary:
There was nothing noteworthy in the working group process

Any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me in the first
instance, or Scott.
2011-05-12
02 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-05-12
02 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Chris Liljenstolpe (ietf@cdl.asgaard.org) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-04-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-01.txt
2011-01-18
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-00.txt