Skip to main content

Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) (D)TLS Profiles for IoT Devices
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-14

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, thomas.fossati@arm.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) (D)TLS Profiles for IoT Devices' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-13.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) (D)TLS Profiles for IoT Devices'
  (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-13.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari, Robert Wilton and Paul Wouters.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This memo extends the Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD)
   specification to incorporate (D)TLS profile parameters.  This allows
   a network security service to identify unexpected (D)TLS usage, which
   can indicate the presence of unauthorized software or malware on an
   endpoint.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Thomas Fossati. The
   Responsible Area Director is Paul Wouters.

IANA Note

  (Insert IANA Note here or remove section)

RFC Editor Note