Technical Summary
The document specifies a common Attachment Circuits (ACs) YANG
module, which is designed with the intent to be reusable by other
models. For example, this common model can be reused by service
models to expose ACs as a service, service models that require
binding a service to a set of ACs, network and device models to
provision ACs, etc.
Working Group Summary
Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
For example, was there controversy about particular points
or were there decisions where the consensus was
particularly rough?
Yes, there were several comments and overall the WG supports the progress of
this draft as key pieces for facilitating service automation. It fills an
important gap by modeling attachment circuits in more detail than had been
done in the past, and therefore have high value.
Document Quality
Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?
[Qin Wu] Some operators have already planned to implement this work for
network slicing automation solution.
Personnel
The Document Shepherd for this document is Reza Rokui. The Responsible
Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani.
IANA Note
All expert reviews have been completed with no blocking issues