A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-09
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9375.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bo Wu , Qin Wu , Mohamed Boucadair , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Bin Wen | ||
| Last updated | 2022-07-19 (Latest revision 2022-05-17) | ||
| Replaces | draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
GENART Last Call review
(of
-12)
by Elwyn Davies
Ready w/nits
TSVART Last Call review
(of
-11)
by Bob Briscoe
On the Right Track
RTGDIR Early review
(of
-08)
by Dhruv Dhody
Has issues
YANGDOCTORS Early review
(of
-05)
by Ladislav Lhotka
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Adrian Farrel | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2022-05-11 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 9375 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Robert Wilton | ||
| Send notices to | adrian@olddog.co.uk |
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-09
OPSAWG Working Group B. Wu, Ed.
Internet-Draft Q. Wu, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei
Expires: 18 November 2022 M. Boucadair, Ed.
Orange
O. Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
B. Wen
Comcast
17 May 2022
A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-09
Abstract
The data model for network topologies defined in RFC 8345 introduces
vertical layering relationships between networks that can be
augmented to cover network and service topologies. This document
defines a YANG module for performance monitoring (PM) of both
networks and VPN services that can be used to monitor and manage
network performance on the topology at higher layer or the service
topology between VPN sites.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 18 November 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage . 4
3.1. Collecting Data via Pub/Sub Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Collecting Data On-demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Description of The Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of
Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Network Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3. Node Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.4. Link and Termination Point Level . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module . 15
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Appendix A. Illustrative Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
A.1. VPN Performance Subscription Example . . . . . . . . . . 36
A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot . . . . . . . . . . . 38
A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
1. Introduction
[RFC8969] describes a framework for automating service and network
management with YANG [RFC6020] models. It defines that the
performance measurement telemetry model should be tied to the
services (such as a Layer 3 VPN or Layer 2 VPN) or to the network
models to monitor the overall network performance and the Service
Level Agreements (SLAs).
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
The performance of VPN services is associated with the performance
changes of the underlay network that carries VPN services, such as
the delay of the underlay tunnels and the packet loss status of the
device interfaces. Additionally, the integration of Layer 2/Layer 3
VPN performance and network performance data enables the orchestrator
to subscribe to VPN service performance in a unified manner.
Therefore, this document defines a YANG module for both network and
VPN service performance monitoring (PM). The module can be used to
monitor and manage network performance on the topology level or the
service topology between VPN sites, in particular.
This document does not introduce new metrics for network performance
or mechanisms for measuring network performance, but uses the
existing mechanisms and statistics to monitor the performance of the
network and the services. All these metrics are defined as
unidirectional metrics.
The YANG module defined in this document is designed as an
augmentation to the network topology YANG model defined in [RFC8345]
and draws on relevant YANG types defined in [RFC6991], [RFC8345],
[RFC8532], and [RFC9181].
Appendix A provides a set of examples to illustrate the use of the
module.
2. Terminology
The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are used in this
specification:
* augment
* data model
* data node
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC7950].
The tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined
in [RFC8340].
2.1. Acronyms
The following acronyms are used in the document:
L2VPN Layer 2 Virtual Private Network
L3VPN Layer 3 Virtual Private Network
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
L2NM L2VPN Network Model
L3NM L3VPN Network Model
MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
OAM Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
OWAMP One-Way Active Measurement Protocol
PE Provider Edge
PM Performance Monitoring
SLA Service Level Agreement
TP Termination Point, as defined in [RFC8345] section 4.2
TWAMP Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol
VPLS Virtual Private LAN Service
VPN Virtual Private Network
3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage
Models are key for automating network management operations.
According to [RFC8969], together with service and network models,
performance measurement telemetry models are needed to monitor
network performance to meet specific service requirements (typically
captured in an SLA).
+---------------+
| Customer |
+-------+-------+
|
Customer Service Models |
|
+-------+---------+
| Service |
| Orchestration |
+------+-+--------+
| |
Network Service Models | | Network and VPN Service PM Models
| |
+------+-+--------+
| Network |
| Controller |
+-------+---------+
|
+-----------------------+------------------------+
Network
Figure 1: Reference Architecture
As shown in Figure 1, in the context of the layering model
architecture described in [RFC8309], the network and VPN service
performance monitoring (PM) model can be used to expose a set of
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
performance information to the above layer. Such information can be
used by an orchestrator to subscribe to performance data. The
network controller will then notify the orchestrator about
corresponding parameter changes.
Before using the model, the controller needs to establish complete
topology visibility of the network and VPN. For example, the
controller can use network information from [RFC8345],
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-sap] or VPN information from [RFC9182],
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]. Then the controller derives network or VPN
level performance data by aggregating (and filtering) lower-level
data collected via monitoring counters of the involved devices.
The network or VPN performance data can be based on different
sources. For example, the performance monitoring data per link in
the underlying network can be collected using a network performance
measurement method such as One-Way Active Measurement Protocol
(OWAMP) [RFC4656], Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
[RFC5357], Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol(STAMP)
[RFC8762], and Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Loss and Delay
Measurement [RFC6374]. The performance monitoring information
reflecting the quality of the network or VPN service (e.g., end-to-
end network performance data between source node and destination node
in the network or between VPN sites) can be computed and aggregated,
for example, using the information from the Traffic Engineering
Database (TED), [RFC7471] [RFC8570] [RFC8571] or LMAP (Large-Scale
Measurement Platform) [RFC8194].
The measurement and report intervals that are associated with these
performance data usually depend on the configuration of the specific
measurement method or collection method or various combinations.
This document defines a network-wide measurement interval to align
measurement requirements for networks or VPN services.
In addition, the amount of performance data collected from the
devices can be huge. To avoid receiving a large amount of
operational data of VPN instances, VPN interfaces, or tunnels, the
network controller can specifically subscribe to metric-specific data
using the tagging methods defined in [I-D.ietf-netmod-node-tags].
3.1. Collecting Data via Pub/Sub Mechanism
Some applications such as service-assurance applications, which must
maintain a continuous view of operational data and state, can use the
subscription model specified in [RFC8641] to subscribe to the
specific network performance data or VPN service performance data
they are interested in, at the data source. For example, network or
VPN topology updates may be obtained through on-change notifications
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
[RFC8641]. For dynamic PM data, various notifications can be
specified to obtain more complete data. A periodic notification
[RFC8641] can be specified to obtain real-time performance data, a
replay notification defined in [RFC5277] or [RFC8639] can be
specified to obtain historical data, or alarm notifications [RFC8632]
can be specified to get alarms for the metrics which exceed or fall
below the performance threshold.
The data source can, then, use the network and VPN service
performance monitoring model defined in this document and the YANG
Push model [RFC8641] to distribute specific telemetry data to target
recipients.
3.2. Collecting Data On-demand
To obtain a snapshot of a large amount of performance data from a
network topology or VPN network, service-assurance applications may
retrieve information using the network and VPN service PM model
through a NETCONF [RFC6241] or a RESTCONF [RFC8040] interface. For
example, a specified "link-id" of a VPN can be used as a filter in a
RESTCONF GET request to retrieve per-link VPN PM data.
4. Description of The Data Model
This document defines the YANG module, "ietf-network-vpn-pm", which
is an augmentation to the "ietf-network" and "ietf-network-topology"
modules.
The performance monitoring data augments the service topology as
shown in Figure 2.
+----------------------+ +---------------------+
|ietf-network | | |
|ietf-network-topology |<---------| ietf-network-vpn-pm |
+----------------------+ augments | |
+---------------------+
Figure 2: Module Augmentation
4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of Topology
[RFC8345] defines a YANG data model for network/service topologies
and inventories. The service topology described in [RFC8345]
includes the virtual topology for a service layer above Layer 1 (L1),
Layer 2 (L2), and Layer 3 (L3). This service topology has the
generic topology elements of node, link, and terminating point. One
typical example of a service topology is described in Figure 3 of
[RFC8345]: two VPN service topologies instantiated over a common L3
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
topology. Each VPN service topology is mapped onto a subset of nodes
from the common L3 topology.
Figure 3 illustrates an example of a topology that maps between the
VPN service topology and an underlying network:
VPN 1 VPN 2
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
/ / / /
/ S1C_[VN3]::: / / /
/ \ ::::: / / S2A_[VN1]____[VN3]_S2B /
/ \ ::: / / : : / Overlay
/ \ :::::::::::: : : /
/ S1B_[VN2]____[VN1]_S1A / / : : /
+---------:-------:------+ +-------:-:----------:---+
: : :::::::::::: : :
: : : : :
Site-1A : +-------:-:------------------:-------:-----+ Site-1C
[CE1]___:_/_______[N1]___________________[N2]___:____/__[CE3]
:/ / / \ _____// : /
[CE5]_____:_______/ / \ _____/ / :: /
Site-2A /: / \ / / :: /
/ : [N5] / :: / Underlay Network
/ : / __/ \__ / :: /
/ : / ___/ \__ /:: /
Site-1B / : / ___/ \ /: / Site-2B
[CE2]__/________[N4]__________________[N3]________/____[CE4]
/ /
+------------------------------------------+
Legend:
N:Node VN:VPN-Node S:Site CE:Customer Edge
__ Link within a network layer
: Mapping between network layers
Figure 3: Example of Topology Mapping Between VPN Service
Topology and Underlying Network
As shown in Figure 3, two VPN services topologies are built on top of
one common underlying physical network:
VPN 1: This service topology supports hub-spoke communications for
'customer 1' connecting the customer's access at three sites:
'Site-1A', 'Site-1B', and 'Site-1C'. These sites are connected to
nodes that are mapped to node 1 (N1), node 2 (N2), and node 4 (N4)
in the underlying physical network. 'Site-1A' plays the role of
hub while 'Site-1B' and 'Site-1C' are configured as spoke.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
VPN 2: This service supports any-to-any communications for 'customer
2' connecting the customer's access at two sites: 'Site-2A' and
'Site-2B'. These sites are connected to nodes that are mapped to
nodes 1 (N1) and node 3 (N3) in the underlying physical network.
'Site-2A' and 'Site-2B' have 'any-to-any' role.
Apart from the association between the VPN topology and the underlay
topology, VPN Network PM can also provide the performance status of
the underlay network and VPN services. For example, network PM can
provide link PM statistics and port statistics. VPN PM can provide
statistics on VPN access interfaces, the number of current VRF routes
or L2VPN MAC entry of VPN nodes, and performance statistics on the
logical point-to-point link between source and destination VPN nodes
or between source and destination VPN access interfaces. Figure 4
illustrates an example of VPN PM and the difference between two VPN
PM measurement methods. One is the VPN tunnel PM and the other is
inter-VPN-access interface PM.
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| |
| VPN2 Link |
| |<-------------------->| |
| | | |
| VPN2+---+---+ +---+---+VPN2 |
| TP1| VN1 | Tunnel PM | VN3 |TP2 |
| ---+ PE A |==============| PE B +---- |
|vpn-access+-------+ +-------+ vpn-access|
|-interface| | -interface|
| |##############################| |
| |inter-vpn-access-interface PM | |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| |
| |
+----+ | TP+-----+ Link +---+ Link +-----+TP | +----+
| CE4+-+----------+ N1 +-------+-N2+-------+ N3 +----------+-+CE5 |
+----+ | 1-1+-----+1-2 2-1+---+2-2 3-1+-----+3-2 | +----+
| |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Legend:
N:node VN:VPN-Node TP:Termination Point
-:Link
Figure 4: An Example of VPN PM
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
4.2. Network Level
For network performance monitoring, the container of "networks" in
[RFC8345] is not extended.
For VPN service performance monitoring, the container "service-type"
is defined to indicate the VPN type, e.g., L3VPN or Virtual Private
LAN Service (VPLS). The values are taken from [RFC9181]. When a
network topology instance contains the L3VPN or other L2VPN network
type, it represents a VPN instance that can perform performance
monitoring.
The tree in Figure 5 is a part of ietf-network-vpn-pm tree. It
defines the following set of network level attributes:
"vpn-id": Refers to an identifier of VPN service defined in
[RFC9181]. This identifier is used to correlate the performance
status with the network service configuration.
"vpn-service-topology": Indicates the type of the VPN topology.
This model supports "any-to-any", "Hub and Spoke" (where Hubs can
exchange traffic), and "Hub and Spoke disjoint" (where Hubs cannot
exchange traffic) that are taken from [RFC9181]. These VPN
topology types can be used to describe how VPN sites communicate
with each other.
module: ietf-network-vpn-pm
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types:
+--rw service-type!
+--rw service-type? identityref
augment /nw:networks/nw:network:
+--rw vpn-pm-attributes
+--rw vpn-id? vpn-common:vpn-id
+--rw vpn-service-topology? identityref
Figure 5: Network Level YANG Tree of the Hierarchies
4.3. Node Level
The tree in Figure 6 is the node part of ietf-network-vpn-pm tree.
For network performance monitoring, a container of "pm-attributes" is
augmented to the list of "node" that are defined in [RFC8345]. The
container includes the following attributes:
"node-type": Indicates the device type of Provider Edge (PE),
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
Provider (P) device, or Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) as
defined in [RFC4026] and [RFC4364], so that the performance metric
between any two nodes each with specific node type can be
reported.
"entry-summary": Lists a set of IPv4 statistics, IPv6 statistics,
and MAC statistics. The detailed statistics are specified
separately.
For VPN service performance monitoring, the model defines one
attribute:
"role": Defines the role in a particular VPN service topology. The
roles are taken from [RFC9181] (e.g., any-to-any-role, spoke-role,
hub-role).
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node:
+--rw pm-attributes
+--rw node-type? identityref
+--ro entry-summary
| +--ro ipv4-num
| | +--ro maximum-routes? uint32
| | +--ro total-active-routes? uint32
| +--ro ipv6-num
| | +--ro maximum-routes? uint32
| | +--ro total-active-routes? uint32
| +--ro mac-num
| +--ro mac-num-limit? uint32
| +--ro total-active-mac-num? uint32
+--rw role? identityref
Figure 6: Node Level YANG Tree of the Hierarchies
4.4. Link and Termination Point Level
The tree in Figure 7 is the link and termination point (TP) part of
ietf-network-vpn-pm tree.
The 'links' are classified into two types: topology link defined in
[RFC8345] and abstract link of a VPN between PEs defined in this
module.
The performance data of a link is a collection of counters and gauges
that report the performance status.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link:
+--rw pm-attributes
+--rw low-percentile? percentile
+--rw intermediate-percentile? percentile
+--rw high-percentile? percentile
+--rw measurement-interval? uint32
+--ro pm* [pm-type]
| +--ro pm-type identityref
| +--ro pm-attributes
| +--ro start-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro end-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro pm-source? identityref
| +--ro one-way-pm-statistics
| | +--ro loss-statistics
| | | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| | +--ro delay-statistics
| | | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro jitter-statistics
| | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro one-way-pm-statistics-per-class* [class-id]
| +--ro class-id string
| +--ro loss-statistics
| | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64
| | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| +--ro delay-statistics
| | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro jitter-statistics
| +--ro unit-value? identityref
| +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
| +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
+--rw vpn-pm-type
+--rw inter-vpn-access-interface
| +--rw inter-vpn-access-interface? empty
+--rw underlay-tunnel!
+--ro vpn-underlay-transport-type? identityref
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point:
+--ro pm-statistics
+--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
+--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro vpn-network-access* [network-access-id]
+--ro network-access-id vpn-common:vpn-id
+--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
+--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64
Figure 7: Link and Termination point Level YANG Tree of the
hierarchies
For the data nodes of 'link' depicted in Figure 7, the YANG module
defines the following minimal set of link-level performance
attributes:
Percentile parameters: The module supports reporting delay and
jitter metric by percentile values. By default, low percentile
(10th percentile), intermediate percentile (50th percentile), high
percentile (90th percentile) are used. Setting a percentile to
0.00 indicates the client is not interested in receiving
particular percentile. If all percentile nodes are set to 0.00,
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
this represents that no percentile related nodes will be reported
for a given performance metric (e.g., one-way delay, one-way delay
variation) and only peak/min values will be reported. For
example, a client can inform the server that it is interested in
receiving only high percentiles. Then for a given link, at a
given "start-time", "end-time" and "measurement-interval", the
'high-delay-percentile' and 'high-jitter-percentile' will be
reported. An example to illustrate the use of percentiles is
provided in Appendix A.3.
Measurement interval ("measurement-interval"): Specifies the
performance measurement interval, in seconds.
Start time ("start-time"): Indicates the start time of the
performance measurement for link statistics.
End time ("end-time"): Indicates the end time of the performance
measurement for link statistics.
PM source ("pm-source"): Indicates the performance monitoring
source. The data for the topology link can be based, e.g., on
BGP-LS [RFC8571]. The statistics of the VPN abstract links can be
collected based upon VPN OAM mechanisms, e.g.,OAM mechanisms
referenced in [RFC9182], or Ethernet service OAM [ITU-T-Y-1731]
referenced in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]. Alternatively, the data can
be based upon the underlay technology OAM mechanisms, for example,
Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnel OAM.
Loss statistics: A set of one-way loss statistics attributes that
are used to measure end to end loss between VPN sites or between
any two network nodes. The exact loss value or the loss
percentage can be reported.
Delay statistics: A set of one-way delay statistics attributes that
are used to measure end to end latency between VPN sites or
between any two network nodes. The peak/min values or percentile
values can be reported.
Jitter statistics: A set of one-way IP Packet Delay Variation
[RFC3393] statistics attributes that are used to measure end to
end jitter between VPN sites or between any two network nodes.
The peak/min values or percentile values can be reported.
PM statistics per class ("one-way-pm-statistics-per-class"): Lists p
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
erformance measurement statistics for the topology link or the
abstract underlay link between VPN PEs with given "class-id"
names. The list is defined separately from "one-way-pm-
statistics", which is used to collect generic metrics for
unspecified "class-id" names.
VPN PM type ("vpn-pm-type"): Indicates the VPN performance type,
which can be inter-vpn-access-interface PM or VPN underlay-tunnel
PM. These two methods are common VPN measurement methods. The
inter-VPN-access-interface PM is to monitor the performance of
logical point-to-point VPN connections between a source and a
destination VPN access interfaces. And the underlay-tunnel PM is
to monitor the performance of underlay tunnels of VPNs. The
inter-VPN-access-interface PM includes PE-PE monitoring.
Therefore, usually only one of the two methods is used. The
inter-VPN-access-interface PM is defined as an empty leaf, which
is not bound to a specific VPN access interface. The source or
destination VPN access interface of the measurement can be
augmented as needed.
VPN underlay transport type ("vpn-underlay-transport-type"): Indicat
es the abstract link protocol-type of a VPN, such as GRE or IP-in-
IP. The leaf refers to an identifier of the "underlay-transport"
defined in [RFC9181], which describes the transport technology to
carry the traffic of the VPN service. In the case of multiple
types of tunnels between a single pair of VPN nodes, a separate
link for each type of tunnel can be created.
For the data nodes of 'termination-point' depicted in Figure 7, the
module defines the following minimal set of statistics:
Last updatd time ("last-updated"): Indicates the timestamp when the
counters were last updated.
Inbound statistics: A set of inbound statistics attributes that are
used to measure the inbound statistics of the termination point,
such as received packets, received packets with errors, etc.
Outbound statistics: A set of outbound statistics attributes that
are used to measure the outbound statistics of the termination
point, such as sent packets, packets that could not be sent due to
errors, etc.
VPN network access ("vpn-network-access"): Lists counters of the VPN
network access defined in [RFC9182] or [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm].
When multiple VPN network accesses are created using the same
physical port, finer-grained metrics can be monitored. If a TP is
associated with only a single VPN, this list is not required.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module
The "ietf-network-vpn-pm" module uses types defined in [RFC8345],
[RFC6991], [RFC8532], and [RFC9181].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-network-vpn-pm@2022-05-17.yang"
module ietf-network-vpn-pm {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm";
prefix nvp;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Types";
}
import ietf-vpn-common {
prefix vpn-common;
reference
"RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and
Layer 3 VPNs.";
}
import ietf-network {
prefix nw;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network
Topologies, Section 6.1";
}
import ietf-network-topology {
prefix nt;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network
Topologies, Section 6.2";
}
import ietf-lime-time-types {
prefix lime;
reference
"RFC 8532: Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Protocols
That Use Connectionless Communications";
}
organization
"IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/>
WG List: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
Editor: Bo Wu
<lana.wubo@huawei.com>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Editor: Qin Wu
<bill.wu@huawei.com>
Author: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
<oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>
Author: Bin Wen
<bin_wen@comcast.com>";
description
"This module defines a model for Network and VPN Service
Performance monitoring.
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC
// publication and remove this note.
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove
// this note.
revision 2022-05-17 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service
Performance Monitoring";
}
identity node-type {
description
"Base identity for node type";
}
identity pe {
base node-type;
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
description
"Provider Edge (PE) node type. A PE is the device
or set of devices at the edge of the provider network with the
functionality that is needed to interface with the customer.";
}
identity p {
base node-type;
description
"Provider router node type. That is, a router
in the core network that does not have interfaces
directly toward a customer.";
}
identity asbr {
base node-type;
description
"Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) node type.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)";
}
identity pm-source-type {
description
"Base identity from which specific performance monitoring
mechanism types are derived.";
}
identity pm-source-bgpls {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates BGP-LS as the performance monitoring metric source";
reference
"RFC 8571: BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of
IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions";
}
identity pm-source-owamp {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates One-Way Active Measurement Protocol(OWAMP)
as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)";
}
identity pm-source-twamp {
base pm-source-type;
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
description
"Indicates Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol(TWAMP)
as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 5357: A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)";
}
identity pm-source-stamp {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol(STAMP)
as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 8762: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol";
}
identity pm-source-y-1731 {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates Ethernet OAM Y.1731 as the performance monitoring
metric source.";
reference
"ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
}
identity pm-type {
description
"Base identity for PM type.";
}
identity pm-type-network-link {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for the link in
the network topology.";
}
identity pm-type-vpn-inter-access {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for the VPN
inter-vpn-access-interface PM to monitor the
performance of logical point-to-point VPN
connections between a source and a destination
VPN access interfaces.";
}
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
identity pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for the VPN
underlay-tunnel to monitor the performance of
underlay tunnels of VPNs";
}
typedef percentage {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 5;
range "0..100";
}
description
"Percentage.";
}
typedef percentile {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 2;
range "0..100";
}
description
"The percentile is a value between 0 and 100,
e.g. 10.00, 99.90 ,99.99 etc..
For example, for a given one-way delay measurement,
if the percentile is set to 95.00 and
the 95th percentile one-way delay is 2 milliseconds,
then the 95 percent of the sample value
is less than or equal to 2 milliseconds.";
}
grouping entry-summary {
description
"Entry summary grouping used for network topology
augmentation.";
container entry-summary {
config false;
description
"Container for VPN or network entry summary.";
container ipv4-num {
leaf maximum-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of IPv4 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-routes {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
type uint32;
description
"Indicates total active IPv4 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"IPv4-specific parameters.";
}
container ipv6-num {
leaf maximum-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of IPv6 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates total active IPv6 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"IPv6-specific parameters.";
}
container mac-num {
leaf mac-num-limit {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of MAC entries
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-mac-num {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the total active MAC entries
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"MAC statistics.";
}
}
}
grouping link-loss-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per link error statistics.";
container loss-statistics {
description
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
"One-way link loss summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf packet-loss-count {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Total number of lost packets.";
}
leaf loss-ratio {
type percentage;
description
"Loss ratio of the packets. Express as percentage
of packets lost with respect to packets sent.";
}
}
}
grouping link-delay-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per link delay statistics.";
container delay-statistics {
description
"One-way link delay summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf unit-value {
type identityref {
base lime:time-unit-type;
}
default "lime:milliseconds";
description
"Time units, where the options are s, ms, ns, etc.";
}
leaf min-delay-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Minimum observed one-way delay.";
}
leaf max-delay-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Maximum observed one-way delay.";
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
}
leaf low-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Low percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
leaf intermediate-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Intermediate percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
leaf high-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"High percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
}
}
grouping link-jitter-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per link jitter statistics.";
container jitter-statistics {
description
"One-way link jitter summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 3393: IP Packet Delay Variation Metric
for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf unit-value {
type identityref {
base lime:time-unit-type;
}
default "lime:milliseconds";
description
"Time units, where the options are s, ms, ns, etc.";
}
leaf min-jitter-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Minimum observed one-way jitter.";
}
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
leaf max-jitter-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Maximum observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf low-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Low percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf intermediate-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Intermediate percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf high-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"High percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
}
}
grouping tp-svc-telemetry {
leaf last-updated {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the time when the counters were last updated.";
}
leaf inbound-octets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of octets received on the
interface, including framing characters.";
}
leaf inbound-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of inbound unicast packets.";
}
leaf inbound-non-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of inbound non-unicast
(i.e., broadcast or multicast) packets.";
}
leaf inbound-discards {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of inbound packets that were chosen to be
discarded even though no errors had been detected.
Possible reasons for discarding such a packet could
be to free up buffer space, not enough buffer for
too much data, etc.";
}
leaf inbound-errors {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of inbound packets that contained errors.";
}
leaf inbound-unknown-protocol {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of packets received via the interface
which were discarded because of an unknown or
unsupported protocol.";
}
leaf outbound-octets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of octets transmitted out of the
interface, including framing characters.";
}
leaf outbound-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of outbound unicast packets.";
}
leaf outbound-non-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of outbound non unicast
(i.e., broadcast or multicast) packets.";
}
leaf outbound-discards {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of outbound packets which were chosen
to be discarded even though no errors had been
detected to prevent their being transmitted.
Possible reasons for discarding such a packet could
be to free up buffer space, not enough buffer for
too much data, etc.";
}
leaf outbound-errors {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of outbound packets that contained
errors.";
}
description
"Grouping for interface service telemetry.";
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types" {
description
"Defines the service topologies types.";
container service-type {
presence "Indicates network service topology.";
leaf service-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:service-type;
}
description
"The presence identifies the network service type,
e.g., L3VPN, VPLS, etc.";
}
description
"Container for VPN service type.";
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network" {
when 'nw:network-types/nvp:service-type' {
description
"Augments only for VPN Network topology.";
}
description
"Augments the network with service topology attributes";
container vpn-pm-attributes {
leaf vpn-id {
type vpn-common:vpn-id;
description
"VPN identifier.";
}
leaf vpn-service-topology {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:vpn-topology;
}
description
"VPN service topology, e.g., hub-spoke, any-to-any,
hub-spoke-disjoint.";
}
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
description
"Container for VPN topology attributes.";
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" {
description
"Augments the network node with other general attributes.";
container pm-attributes {
leaf node-type {
type identityref {
base node-type;
}
description
"Node type, e.g., PE, P, ASBR.";
}
description
"Container for node attributes.";
uses entry-summary;
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/pm-attributes" {
when '../../nw:network-types/nvp:service-type' {
description
"Augments only for VPN node attributes.";
}
description
"Augments the network node with VPN specific attributes.";
leaf role {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:role;
}
default "vpn-common:any-to-any-role";
description
"Role of the node in the VPN.";
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" {
description
"Augments the network topology link with performance
monitoring attributes.";
container pm-attributes {
description
"Container for PM attributes.";
leaf low-percentile {
type percentile;
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
default "10.00";
description
"Low percentile to report. Setting low-percentile
into 0.00 indicates the client is not interested
in receiving low percentile.";
}
leaf intermediate-percentile {
type percentile;
default "50.00";
description
"Intermediate percentile to report. Setting
intermediate-percentile into 0.00 indicates the client
is not interested in receiving intermediate percentile.";
}
leaf high-percentile {
type percentile;
default "95.00";
description
"High percentile to report. Setting high-percentile
into 0.00 indicates the client is not interested in
receiving high percentile.";
}
leaf measurement-interval {
type uint32 {
range "1..max";
}
units "seconds";
default "60";
description
"Indicates the time interval to perform PM measurement.";
}
list pm {
key "pm-type";
config false;
description
"The list of PM based on PM type";
leaf pm-type {
type identityref {
base pm-type;
}
config false;
description
"The PM type of the measured PM attributes";
}
container pm-attributes {
description
"Container for PM attributes.";
leaf start-time {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"The time that the current measurement started.";
}
leaf end-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"The time that the current measurement ended.";
}
leaf pm-source {
type identityref {
base pm-source-type;
}
config false;
description
"The OAM tool used to collect the PM data.";
}
container one-way-pm-statistics {
config false;
description
"Container for link telemetry attributes.";
uses link-loss-statistics;
uses link-delay-statistics;
uses link-jitter-statistics;
}
list one-way-pm-statistics-per-class {
key "class-id";
config false;
description
"The list of PM data based on class of service.";
leaf class-id {
type string;
description
"The class-id is used to identify the class of service.
This identifier is internal to the administration.";
}
uses link-loss-statistics;
uses link-delay-statistics;
uses link-jitter-statistics;
}
}
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/pm-attributes" {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
when '../../nw:network-types/nvp:service-type' {
description
"Augments only for VPN Network topology.";
}
description
"Augments the network topology link with VPN service
performance monitoring attributes.";
container vpn-pm-type {
description
"The VPN PM type of this logical point-to-point
unidirectional VPN link.";
container inter-vpn-access-interface {
description
"Indicates inter-vpn-access-interface PM, which is to
monitor the performance of logical point-to-point VPN
connections between a source and a destination
VPN access interfaces.";
leaf inter-vpn-access-interface {
type empty;
description
"This is a placeholder for inter-vpn-access-interface PM,
which is not bound to a specific VPN access interface.
The source or destination VPN access interface
of the measurement can be augmented as needed.";
}
}
container underlay-tunnel {
presence "Enables VPN underlay tunnel PM";
description
"Indicates underlay-tunnel PM, which is to monitor
the performance of underlay tunnels of VPNs.";
leaf vpn-underlay-transport-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:protocol-type;
}
config false;
description
"The leaf indicates the underlay transport type of
a VPN service, e.g., GRE, LDP, etc.";
}
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point" {
description
"Augments the network topology termination point with
performance monitoring attributes.";
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
container pm-statistics {
config false;
description
"Container for termination point PM attributes.";
uses tp-svc-telemetry;
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node"
+ "/nt:termination-point/pm-statistics" {
when '../../../nw:network-types/nvp:service-type' {
description
"Augments only for VPN Network topology.";
}
description
"Augments the network topology termination-point with
VPN service performance monitoring attributes";
list vpn-network-access {
key "network-access-id";
description
"The list of PM based on VPN network accesses.";
leaf network-access-id {
type vpn-common:vpn-id;
description
"The reference to an identifier for the VPN network
access.";
}
uses tp-svc-telemetry;
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types": This subtree specifies
the VPN service type. Unauthorized access to this subtree may
render the VPN service type invalid.
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nvp:vpn-pm-attributes": This subtree
specifies the VPN service identifier and VPN service topology.
Unauthorized access to this subtree may disable the the VPN PM or
render the VPN service topology invalid.
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nvp:pm-attributes": This subtree
specifies the network node type and VPN service topology role.
Unauthorized access to this subtree may render the node type or
VPN service topology invalid.
* /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/nvp:pm-attributes": This subtree
specifies the PM of the network link and VPN link. Unauthorized
access to this subtree can impact the network and VPN monitoring.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nvp:pm-attributes/nvp:vpn-
summary-statistics": Unauthorized access to this subtree can
disclose the operational state information of VPN instances.
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/nvp:pm-attributes/nvp:one-way-pm-
statistics": Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the
operational state information of network links or VPN abstract
links.
* "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point/nvp:pm-
statistics": Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the
operational state information of network termination points or VPN
network accesses.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
7. IANA Considerations
This document requests IANA to register the following URI in the "ns"
subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document requests IANA to register the following YANG module in
the "YANG Module Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG
Parameters" registry.
Name: ietf-network-vpn-pm
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm
Maintained by IANA: N
Prefix: nvp
Reference: RFC XXXX (RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual
RFC number and remove this note.)
8. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Joe Clarke, Adrian Farrel, Tom Petch, Greg Mirsky, Roque
Gagliano, Erez Segev, and Dhruv Dhody for reviewing and providing
important input to this document.
9. Contributors
The following authors contributed significantly to this document:
Michale Wang
Huawei
Email:wangzitao@huawei.com
Roni Even
Huawei
Email: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com
Change Liu
China Unicom
Email: liuc131@chinaunicom.cn
Honglei Xu
China Telecom
Email: xuhl6@chinatelecom.cn
10. References
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
10.1. Normative References
[ITU-T-Y-1731]
ITU-T, "Operator Ethernet Service Definition", August
2015, <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1731/en>.
[RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation
Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3393>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364>.
[RFC4656] Shalunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J., and M.
Zekauskas, "A One-way Active Measurement Protocol
(OWAMP)", RFC 4656, DOI 10.17487/RFC4656, September 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4656>.
[RFC5357] Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J.
Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)",
RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5357>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6374] Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay
Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6374>.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for
Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8532] Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Ed., Rahman, R., and S.
Raghavan, "Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
Protocols That Use Connectionless Communications",
RFC 8532, DOI 10.17487/RFC8532, April 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8532>.
[RFC8571] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and
C. Filsfils, "BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of
IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions",
RFC 8571, DOI 10.17487/RFC8571, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8571>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
[RFC8762] Mirsky, G., Jun, G., Nydell, H., and R. Foote, "Simple
Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol", RFC 8762,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8762, March 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8762>.
[RFC9181] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., and Q. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and
Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9181, DOI 10.17487/RFC9181, February
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9181>.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-netmod-node-tags]
Wu, Q., Claise, B., Liu, P., Du, Z., and M. Boucadair,
"Data Node Tags in YANG Modules", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-07, 29 April
2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netmod-
node-tags-07.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]
Boucadair, M., Dios, O. G. D., Barguil, S., and L. A.
Munoz, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs", Work
in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-16, 13
May 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-
opsawg-l2nm-16.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-sap]
Boucadair, M., Dios, O. G. D., Barguil, S., Wu, Q., and V.
Lopez, "A Network YANG Model for Service Attachment Points
(SAPs)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
opsawg-sap-04, 11 April 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-
04.txt>.
[RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual
Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4026>.
[RFC5277] Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event
Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, July 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5277>.
[RFC7471] Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., Atlas, A., and S.
Previdi, "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric
Extensions", RFC 7471, DOI 10.17487/RFC7471, March 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7471>.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
[RFC8194] Schoenwaelder, J. and V. Bajpai, "A YANG Data Model for
LMAP Measurement Agents", RFC 8194, DOI 10.17487/RFC8194,
August 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8194>.
[RFC8309] Wu, Q., Liu, W., and A. Farrel, "Service Models
Explained", RFC 8309, DOI 10.17487/RFC8309, January 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8309>.
[RFC8570] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward,
D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE)
Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, March
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8570>.
[RFC8632] Vallin, S. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for Alarm
Management", RFC 8632, DOI 10.17487/RFC8632, September
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8632>.
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8969] Wu, Q., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Lopez, D., Xie, C., and
L. Geng, "A Framework for Automating Service and Network
Management with YANG", RFC 8969, DOI 10.17487/RFC8969,
January 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8969>.
[RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model
for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182,
February 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9182>.
Appendix A. Illustrative Examples
A.1. VPN Performance Subscription Example
The example shown in Figure 8 illustrates how a client subscribes to
the performance monitoring information between nodes ('node-id') A
and B in the L3 network topology. The performance monitoring
parameter that the client is interested in is end-to-end loss.
POST /restconf/operations
/ietf-subscribed-notifications:establish-subscription
{
"ietf-subscribed-notifications:input": {
"stream-subtree-filter": {
"ietf-network:networks": {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
"network": {
"network-id": "foo:l3-network",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:service-type": {
"ietf-vpn-common:l3vpn": {}
},
"node": [
{
"node-id": "A",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"node-type": "PE"
},
"termination-point": {
"tp-id": "1-0-1"
}
},
{
"node-id": "B",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"node-type": "PE"
},
"termination-point": {
"tp-id": "2-0-1"
}
}
],
"ietf-network-topology:link": {
"link-id": "A-B",
"source": {
"source-node": "A"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "B"
},
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"loss-statistics": {
"packet-loss-count": {}
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"underlay-tunnel": {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
"vpn-underlay-transport-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre"
}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"ietf-yang-push:periodic": {
"ietf-yang-push:period": "500"
}
}
}
Figure 8: Pub/Sub Retrieval
A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot
This example, depicted in Figure 9, illustrates an VPN PM instance
example in which a client uses RESTCONF [RFC8040] to fetch the
performance data of the link and TP belonged to "VPN1".
{
"ietf-network:networks": {
"network": {
"network-id": "foo:vpn1",
"node": [
{
"node-id": "A",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"node-type": "PE"
},
"termination-point": {
"tp-id": "1-0-1",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": {
"inbound-octets": "100",
"outbound-octets": "150"
}
}
},
{
"node-id": "B",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"node-type": "PE"
},
"termination-point": {
"tp-id": "2-0-1",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": {
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
"inbound-octets": "150",
"outbound-octets": "100"
}
}
}
],
"ietf-network-topology:link": {
"link-id": "A-B",
"source": {
"source-node": "A"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "B"
},
"ietf-network-pm:pm-attributes": {
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"loss-statistics": {
"packet-loss-count": "120"
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"underlay-tunnel": {
"vpn-underlay-transport-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Figure 9
A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring
The following shows an example of a percentile measurement for a VPN
link.
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
{
"ietf-network-topology:link": [
{
"link-id": "foo:vpn1-link1",
"source": {
"source-node": "vpn-node1"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "vpn-node3"
},
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-attributes": {
"low-percentile": "20.00",
"intermediate-percentile": "50.00",
"high-percentile": "90.00",
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-inter-access",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"delay-statistics": {
"unit-value": "lime:milliseconds",
"min-delay-value": "43",
"max-delay-value": "99",
"low-delay-percentile": "64",
"intermediate-delay-percentile": "77",
"high-delay-percentile": "98"
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"inter-vpn-access-interface": {
"inter-vpn-access-interface": [null]
}
}
}
}
]
}
Authors' Addresses
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG May 2022
Bo Wu (editor)
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing
Jiangsu, 210012
China
Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com
Qin Wu (editor)
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing
Jiangsu, 210012
China
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Mohamed Boucadair (editor)
Orange
Rennes 35000
France
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
Madrid
Spain
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Bin Wen
Comcast
Email: bin_wen@comcast.com
Wu, et al. Expires 18 November 2022 [Page 41]