%% You should probably cite rfc7707 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning/08/},
    author =    {Fernando Gont and Tim Chown},
    title =     {{Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks}},
    pagetotal = 38,
    year =      2015,
    month =     aug,
    day =       28,
    abstract =  {IPv6 offers a much larger address space than that of its IPv4 counterpart. An IPv6 subnet of size /64 can (in theory) accommodate approximately 1.844 * 10\textasciicircum{}19 hosts, thus resulting in a much lower host density (\#hosts/\#addresses) than is typical in IPv4 networks, where a site typically has 65,000 or fewer unique addresses. As a result, it is widely assumed that it would take a tremendous effort to perform address-scanning attacks against IPv6 networks; therefore, IPv6 address-scanning attacks have been considered unfeasible. This document formally obsoletes RFC 5157, which first discussed this assumption, by providing further analysis on how traditional address-scanning techniques apply to IPv6 networks and exploring some additional techniques that can be employed for IPv6 network reconnaissance.},
}