%% You should probably cite rfc8770 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/09/},
    author =    {Keyur Patel and Padma Pillay-Esnault and Manish Bhardwaj and Serpil Bayraktar},
    title =     {{Host Router Support for OSPFv2}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2019,
    month =     sep,
    day =       14,
    abstract =  {The Open Shortest Path First Version 2 (OSPFv2) does not have a mechanism for a node to repel transit traffic if it is on the shortest path. This document assigns a new bit (Host-bit) in the OSPF Router-LSA bit registry and in the OSPF Router Informational Capability Bits Registry that enables a host router to advertise that it is a non-transit router. It also describes the changes needed to support the Host-bit in the domain. In addition, this document updates OSPF Stub Router Advertisement (RFC6987) to advertise for type-2 External and NSSA LSAs with a high cost in order to repel traffic effectively.},
}