OSPF Database Overflow
draft-ietf-ospf-overflow-00
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 1765.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | John Moy | ||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 (Latest revision 1994-11-28) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 1765 (Experimental) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-ospf-overflow-00
Network Working Group J. Moy
Internet Draft Cascade
Expiration Date: May 1995 November 1994
File name: draft-ietf-ospf-overflow-00.txt
OSPF Database Overflow
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet- Drafts Shadow
Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net
(Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific
Rim).
Abstract
Proper operation of the OSPF protocol requires that all OSPF routers
maintain an identical copy of the OSPF link-state database.
However, when the size of the link-state database becomes very
large, some routers may be unable to keep the entire database due to
resource shortages; we term this "database overflow". When database
overflow is anticipated, the routers with limited resources can be
accommodated by configuring OSPF stub areas and NSSAs. This memo
details a way of gracefully handling unanticipated database
overflows.
This memo is a product of the OSPF Working Group. Please send
comments to ospf@gated.cornell.edu.
Moy [Page 1]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
Table of Contents
1 Overview ............................................... 3
2 Implementation details ................................. 4
2.1 Configuration .......................................... 4
2.2 Entering OverflowState ................................. 5
2.3 Operation while in OverflowState ....................... 6
2.3.1 Modifications to Flooding .............................. 6
2.3.2 Originating AS-external-LSAs ........................... 7
2.3.3 Receiving self-originated LSAs ......................... 7
2.4 Leaving OverflowState .................................. 7
3 An example ............................................. 7
4 Administrative response to database overflow ........... 8
5 Operational experience ................................. 9
6 Possible enhancements .................................. 9
A Related MIB parameters ................................ 10
References ............................................ 11
Security Considerations ............................... 11
Author's Address ...................................... 11
Moy [Page 2]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
1. Overview
OSPF requires that all OSPF routers within a single area maintain an
identical copy of the OSPF link-state database. However, when the
size of the link-state database becomes very large, some routers may
be unable to keep the entire database due to resource shortages; we
term this "database overflow". For example, a regional network may
have a very large OSPF database because it is importing a large
number of external routes into OSPF. Unless database overflow is
handled correctly, routers will end up with inconsistent views of
the network, possibly leading to incorrect routing.
One way of handling database overflow is to encase routers having
limited resources within OSPF stub areas (see Section 3.6 of [1]) or
NSSAs ([2]). AS-external-LSAs are omitted from these areas' link-
state databases, thereby controlling database size.
However, unexpected database overflows cannot be handled in the
above manner. This memo describes a way of dynamically limiting
database size under overflow conditions. The basic mechanism is as
follows:
(1) A parameter, ospfExtLsdbLimit, is configured in each router
indicating the maximum number of AS-external-LSAs (excluding
those describing the default route) that are allowed in the
link-state database. This parameter must be the same in all
routers in the routing domain (see Section 2.1); synchronization
of the parameter is achieved via network management.
(2) In any router's database, the number of AS-external-LSAs
(excluding default) is never allowed to exceed ospfExtLsdbLimit.
If a router receives a non-default AS-external-LSA that would
cause the limit of ospfExtLsdbLimit to be exceeded, it drops the
LSA and does NOT acknowledge it.
(3) If the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a router's
database hits ospfExtLsdbLimit, the router a) flushes all non-
default AS-external-LSAs that it has itself originated (see
Section 2.2) and b) goes into "OverflowState".
(4) While in OverflowState, the router refuses to originate any
non-default AS-external-LSAs (see Section 2.3.2).
(5) Optionally, the router can attempt to leave OverflowState after
the configurable parameter ExitOverflowInterval has elapsed
since entering Overflow state (see Section 2.4). Only at this
point can the router resume originating non-default AS-
external-LSAs.
Moy [Page 3]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
The reason for limiting non-default AS-external-LSAs, but not other
LSA types, is twofold. First of all, the non-default AS-external
LSAs are the most likely to dominate the database size in those
networks with huge databases (e.g., regional networks; see [5]).
Second, the non-default AS-external-LSAs can be viewed as "optional"
in the following sense: the router can probably be
monitored/reconfigured without them. (However, using similar
strategies, other LSA types can also be limited; see Section 5.)
The method of dealing with database overflow described herein has
the following desirable properties:
o After a short period of convergence, all routers will have
identical link-state databases. This database will contain less
than ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default AS-external-LSAs.
o At all times, routing WITHIN the OSPF Autonomous System will
remain intact. Among other things, this means that the routers
will continue to be manageable.
o Default routing to external destinations will also remain
intact. This hopefully will mean that a large amount of external
connectivity will be preserved, although possibly taking less
efficient routes.
o If parameter ExitOverflowInterval is configured, the OSPF system
will recover fully and automatically (i.e., without network
management intervention) from transient database overflow
conditions (see Section 2.4).
2. Implementation details
This section describes the mechanism for dealing with database
overflow in more detail. The section is organized around the concept
OverflowState, describing how routers enter the OverflowState, the
operation of the router while in OverflowState, and when the router
leaves OverflowState.
2.1. Configuration
The following configuration parameters are added to support the
database overflow functionality. These parameters are set by
network management.
ospfExtLsdbLimit
When the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a
router's link-state database reaches ospfExtLsdbLimit, the
router enters OverflowState. The router never holds more
Moy [Page 4]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
than ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default AS-external-LSAs in its
database.
OspfExtLsdbLimit MUST be set identically in all routers
attached to the OSPF backbone and/or any "regular" OSPF
area. (This memo does not pertain to routers contained
within OSPF stub areas or NSSAs, since such routers do not
receive AS-external-LSAs.) If ospfExtLsdbLimit is not set
identically in all routers, then when the database
overflows: 1) the routers will NOT converge on a common
link-state database, 2) incorrect routing, possibly
including routing loops, will result and 3) constant
retransmission of AS-external-LSAs will occur. Identical
setting of ospfExtLsdbLimit is achieved/ensured by network
management.
When ospfExtLsdbLimit is set in a router, the router must
have some way to guarantee that it can hold that many non-
default AS-external-LSAs in its link-state database. One way
of doing this is to preallocate resources (e.g., memory) for
the configured number of LSAs.
ExitOverflowInterval
The number of minutes that, after entering OverflowState, a
router will attempt to leave OverflowState. This allows the
router to again originate non-default AS-external-LSAs. When
set to 0, the router will not leave OverflowState until
restarted. The default setting for ExitOverflowInterval is
0.
It is not necessary for ExitOverflowInterval to be
configured the same in all routers. A smaller value may be
configured in those routers that originate the "more
important" AS-external-LSAs. In fact, setting
ExitOverflowInterval the same may cause problems, as
multiple routers attempt to leave OverflowState
simultaneously. For this reason, the value of
ExitOverflowInterval must be "jittered" by adding a random
number in the range of 1 to 10 to ExitOverflowInterval
before using.
2.2. Entering OverflowState
The router enters OverflowState when the number of non-default
AS-external-LSAs in the database hits ospfExtLsdbLimit. There
are two cases when this can occur. First, when receiving an LSA
during flooding. In this case, an LSA which does not already
have a database instance is added in Step 5 of Section 13 of
Moy [Page 5]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
[1]. The second case is when the router originates a non-
default AS-external-LSA itself.
Whenever the router enters OverflowState it flushes all non-
default AS-external-LSAs that it itself had originated. Flushing
is accomplished through the premature aging scheme described in
Section 14.1 of [1]. Only self-originated LSAs are flushed;
those originated by other routers are kept in the link-state
database.
2.3. Operation while in OverflowState
While in OverflowState, the flooding and origination of non-
default AS-external-LSAs are modified in the following fashion.
2.3.1. Modifications to Flooding
Flooding while in OverflowState is modified as follows. If
in Step 5 of Section 13 of [1], a non-default AS-external-
LSA has been received that a) has no current database
instance and b) would cause the count of non-default AS-
external-LSAs to exceed ospfExtLsdbLimit, then that LSA is
discarded. Such an LSA is not installed in the link-state
database, nor is it acknowledged.
When all routers have identical values for ospfExtLsdbLimit
(as required), the above flooding modification should be
exercised only during a short period of convergence. During
convergence, there will be retransmissions of LSAs. However,
after convergence the retransmissions will cease, as the
routers settle on a database having less than
ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default As-external-LSAs.
In OverflowState, non-default AS-external-LSAs ARE still
accepted in the following conditions:
(1) If the LSA updates an LSA that currently exists in the
router's link-state database.
(2) LSAs having LS age of MaxAge are always accepted. The
processing of these LSAs follows the procedures
described in Sections 13 and 14 of [1].
(3) If adding the LSA to the router's database would keep
the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs less than or
equal to ospfExtLsdbLimit, the LSA is accepted.
Moy [Page 6]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
2.3.2. Originating AS-external-LSAs
Originating AS-external-LSAs is described in Section 12.4.5
of [1]. When a router is in OverflowState, it does not
originate non-default AS-external-LSAs. In other words, the
only AS-external-LSAs originated by a router in
OverflowState have Link State ID 0.0.0.0.
2.3.3. Receiving self-originated LSAs
Receiving self-originated LSAs is described in Section 13.4
of [1]. When in OverflowState, a router receiving a self-
originated non-default AS-external-LSA responds by flushing
it from the routing domain using the premature aging scheme
described in Section 14.1 of [1].
2.4. Leaving OverflowState
If ExitOverflowInterval is non-zero, then as soon as a router
enters OverflowState, it sets a timer equal to the value of
ExitOverflowInterval plus a random value between 1 and 10. When
this timer fires, the router leaves OverflowState and begins
originating non-default AS-external-LSAs again.
This allows a router to automatically recover from transient
overflow conditions. For example, an AS boundary router that
imports a great many AS-external-LSAs may crash. Other routers
may then start importing the routes, but until the crashed AS
boundary router is either a) restarted or b) its AS-external-
LSAs age out, there will be a much larger database than usual.
Since such an overflow is guaranteed to go away in MaxAge
seconds (1 hour), automatic recovery may be appropriate (and
fast enough) if the overflow happens off-hours.
As soon as the router leaves OverflowState, it is again eligible
to reenter Overflow state according to the text of Section 2.2.
3. An example
As an example, suppose that a router implements the database
overflow logic, and that its ospfExtLsdbLimit is 10,000 and its
ExitOverflowInterval is set to 10 minutes. Suppose further that the
router itself is originating 400 non-default AS-external-LSAs, and
that the current number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in the
router's database is equal to 9,997.
Next it receives a Link State Update packet from a neighbor,
containing 6 non-default AS-external-LSAs, none of which have
Moy [Page 7]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
current database copies. The first two LSAs are then installed in
the database. The third LSA is also installed in the database, but
causes the router to go into OverflowState. Going into
OverflowState causes the router to flush (via premature aging) its
400 self-originated non-default LSAs. However, these 400 LSAs are
still considered to be part of the link-state database until their
re-flooding (with age set to MaxAge) is acknowledged (see Section 14
of [1]); for this reason, the last three LSAs in the received update
are discarded without being acknowledged.
After some small period of time all routers will converge on a
common database, having less than 10,000 non-default AS-external-
LSAs. During this convergence period there may be some link-state
retransmissions; for example, the sender of the above Link State
Update packet may retransmit the three LSAs that were discarded. If
this retransmission happens after the flushing of the 400 self-
originated LSAs is acknowledged, the 3 LSAs will then be accepted.
Going into OverflowState also causes the router to set a timer that
will fire some time between 11 and 20 minutes later. When this timer
fires, the router will leave OverflowState and re-originate its 400
non-default AS-external-LSAs, provided that the current database has
less than 9600 (10,000 - 400) non-default AS-external-LSAs. If there
are more than 9600, the timer is simply restarted.
4. Administrative response to database overflow
Once the link-state database has overflowed, it may take
intervention by network management before all routing is restored.
(If the overflow condition is transient, routing may be restored
automatically; see Section 2.4 for details.) An overflow condition
is indicated by SNMP traps (see Appendix B). Possible responses by a
network manager may include:
o Increasing the value of ospfExtLsdbLimit. Perhaps it had been
set too conservatively, and the routers are able to support
larger databases than they are currently configured for.
o Isolating routers having limited resources within OSPF stub
areas or NSSAs. This would allow increasing the value of
ospfExtLsdbLimit in the remaining routers.
o Reevaluating the need to import certain external routes. If
ospfExtLsdbLimit cannot be increased, the network manager will
want to make sure that the more important routes continue to be
imported; this is accomplished by turning off the importing of
less important routes.
Moy [Page 8]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
5. Operational experience
The database overflow scheme described in this memo has been
implemented in the Proteon router for a number of years, with the
following differences. First, the router did not leave OverflowState
until it was restarted (i.e., ExitOverflowInterval was always 0).
Second, default AS-external-LSAs were not separated from non-default
AS-external-LSAs. Operationally the scheme performed as expected:
during overflow conditions, the routers converged on a common
database having less than a configured number of AS-external-LSAs.
6. Possible enhancements
Possible enhancements to the overflow scheme include the following:
o Other LSA types, with the exception of the transit LSAs
(router-LSAs and network-LSAs), could be limited in a similar
fashion. For example, one could limit the number of summary-
LSAs, or group-membership-LSAs (see [6]).
o Rather than flushing all of its non-default AS-external-LSAs
when entering OverflowState, a router could flush a fixed number
whenever the database size hits ospfExtLsdbLimit. This would
allow the router to prioritize its AS-external-LSAs, flushing
the least important ones first.
Moy [Page 9]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
A. Related MIB parameters
The following OSPF MIB variables have been defined to support the
database overflow procedure described in this memo (see [4] for more
information):
ospfExtLsdbLimit
The maximum number of AS-external-LSAs that can be stored within
the database. If set to -1, there is no limit. In this memo, we
have excluded default route AS-external-LSAs (those having Link
State ID of 0.0.0.0) from the limit. This parameter is then the
same as "ospfExtLsdbLimit" in Section 2.1.
ospfLsdbOverflow
A trap indicating that the number of non-default AS-external-
LSAs has exceeded ospfExtLsdbLimit. For this memo, we would
modify this to "exceeded or equaled". This trap then indicates
that the router is entering OverflowState.
ospfLsdbApproachingOverflow
A trap indicating that the number of non-default AS-external-
LSAs has exceeded ninety percent of "ospfExtLsdbLimit".
Moy [Page 10]
Internet Draft OSPF Database Overflow November 1994
References
[1] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 1583, Proteon, Inc., March 1994.
[2] Coltun, R. and V. Fuller, "The OSPF NSSA Option", RFC 1587,
RainbowBridge Communications, Stanford University, March 1994.
[3] Moy, J., editor, "OSPF protocol analysis", RFC 1245, Proteon,
Inc., July 1991.
[4] Baker F. and R. Coltun, "OSPF Version 2 Management Information
Base", work in progress.
[5] Moy, J., editor, "Experience with the OSPF protocol", RFC 1246,
Proteon, Inc., July 1991.
[6] Moy, J., "Multicast Extensions to OSPF", RFC 1584, Proteon,
Inc., March 1994.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
John Moy
Cascade Communications Corp.
5 Carlisle Road
Westford, MA 01886
Phone: 508-692-2600 Ext. 394
Fax: 508-692-9214
Email: jmoy@casc.com
This document expires in May 1995.
Moy [Page 11]