%% You should probably cite rfc8920 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-16,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-16},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/16/},
    author =    {Peter Psenak and Les Ginsberg and Wim Henderickx and Jeff Tantsura and John Drake},
    title =     {{OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes}},
    pagetotal = 19,
    year =      2020,
    month =     jun,
    day =       30,
    abstract =  {Existing traffic-engineering-related link attribute advertisements have been defined and are used in RSVP-TE deployments. Since the original RSVP-TE use case was defined, additional applications (e.g., Segment Routing Policy and Loop-Free Alternates) that also make use of the link attribute advertisements have been defined. In cases where multiple applications wish to make use of these link attributes, the current advertisements do not support application-specific values for a given attribute, nor do they support indication of which applications are using the advertised value for a given link. This document introduces new link attribute advertisements in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 that address both of these shortcomings.},
}