%% You should probably cite rfc8184 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection/05/},
    author =    {Weiqiang Cheng and Lei Wang and Han Li and Shahram Davari and Jie Dong},
    title =     {{Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and MPLS-TP Pseudowires}},
    pagetotal = 11,
    year =      2017,
    month =     jan,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {This document describes a framework and several scenarios for a Pseudowire (PW) dual-homing local protection mechanism which avoids unnecessary switchovers and which can be used for scenarios using a control plane or not using a control plane. A Dual-Node Interconnection (DNI) PW is used for carrying traffic between the dual-homing Provider Edge (PE) nodes for carrying traffic when a failure occurs in one of the Attachment Circuits (AC) or PWs. This PW dual-homing local protection mechanism is complementary to existing PW protection mechanisms.},
}