%% You should probably cite rfc8184 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-06, number = {draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-06}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection/06/}, author = {Weiqiang Cheng and Lei Wang and Han Li and Shahram Davari and Jie Dong}, title = {{Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires}}, pagetotal = 11, year = 2017, month = apr, day = 25, abstract = {This document describes a framework and several scenarios for a pseudowire (PW) dual-homing local protection mechanism that avoids unnecessary switchovers and does not depend on whether a control plane is used. A Dual-Node Interconnection (DNI) PW is used to carry traffic between the dual-homing Provider Edge (PE) nodes when a failure occurs in one of the Attachment Circuits (AC) or PWs. This PW dual-homing local protection mechanism is complementary to existing PW protection mechanisms.}, }