%% You should probably cite rfc7795 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-01, number = {draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/01/}, author = {Jie Dong and Haibo Wang}, title = {{Pseudowire Redundancy on S-PE}}, pagetotal = 8, year = 2015, month = may, day = 4, abstract = {This document describes Multi-Segment Pseudowire (MS-PW) protection scenarios in which the pseudowire redundancy is provided on the Switching-PE (S-PE). Operations of the S-PEs which provide PW redundancy are specified in this document. Signaling of the preferential forwarding status as defined in {[}RFC 6870{]} is reused. This document does not require any change to the T-PEs of MS-PW.}, }