%% You should probably cite rfc7795 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/02/},
    author =    {Jie Dong and Haibo Wang},
    title =     {{Pseudowire Redundancy on S-PE}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2015,
    month =     aug,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {This document describes Multi-Segment Pseudowire (MS-PW) protection scenarios in which the pseudowire redundancy is provided on the Switching-PE (S-PE). Operations of the S-PEs which provide PW redundancy are specified in this document. Signaling of the preferential forwarding status as defined in RFC 6870 is reused. This document does not require any change to the T-PEs of MS-PW.},
}