Skip to main content

RTP Payload Format for MIDI
draft-ietf-payload-rfc4695-bis-02

Yes

(Robert Sparks)

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-01) Unknown
Section 1.2

   In this document, the packet bitfields that share a common name often
   have identical semantics.

This left me wondering how I find the cases where they have common names
but different semantics.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-07) Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-02) Unknown
In the IANA Considerations Section: 

> This document does not change any of the registrations in RFC 4695.
Therefore, this document does not require any IANA actions, apart from
updating the references to RFC 4695 to point to this document.

It looks to me that both documents (this one and RFC 4695) need to be referenced in the IANA pages. The reason is that while this document obsolets RFC 4695 it does not carry the text that refers to the creation of the registries. 
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-01) Unknown
  Please add a sentence to the Abstract that indicates that this
  document obsoletes RFC 4695.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-01) Unknown
#1) Since this is a bis document, I presume it's been used for a while.  Maybe the tense should change in intro to reflect this? Likewise, the original premise of 4965 was to allow musicians to be in different locations but still jam together - did it work?

#2)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown