%% You should probably cite rfc8741 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request/00/},
    author =    {Aswatnarayan Raghuram and Al Goddard and Chaitanya Yadlapalli and Jay Karthik and Siva Sivabalan and Jon Parker and Dhruv Dhody},
    title =     {{Ability for a stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2018,
    month =     feb,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {The stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions provide stateful control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where a Path Computation Client (PCC) delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to a stateful PCE. There are use-cases in which a stateful PCE may wish to request and obtain control of one or more LSPs from a PCC. This document describes a simple extension to stateful PCEP to achieve such an objective.},
}