%% You should probably cite rfc8408 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-10,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type/10/},
    author =    {Siva Sivabalan and Jeff Tantsura and Ina Minei and Robert Varga and Jonathan Hardwick},
    title =     {{Conveying Path Setup Type in PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Messages}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2018,
    month =     may,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {A Path Computation Element (PCE) can compute Traffic Engineering (TE) paths through a network; these paths are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are Label Switched Paths (LSPs) that are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to the PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) to allow support for different path setup methods over a given PCEP session.},
}