Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-05
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment
(2018-01-08 for -04)
Unknown
Like EKR I'm confused / concerned about what happens if 2 experiments choose the same codepoint -- while there isn't really anything that the document can really do to prevent it, I think that it is worth having a bit more text mentioning that implementors should consider this, and e.g experimental use should handle failures differently to production. Seeing as EKR is carrying the DISCUSS I'll ballot NoObj and follow along.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-01-10 for -04)
Unknown
I'd like to see the Gen-ART reviewer's comment addressed per the discussion on the list.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-01-10 for -04)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my discuss
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown