Ballot for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls

Yes

(John Scudder)

No Objection

Éric Vyncke
Jim Guichard
Roman Danyliw
(Andrew Alston)
(Erik Kline)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Paul Wouters)
(Robert Wilton)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 21 and is now closed.

Éric Vyncke
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2023-06-08 for -22) Sent
Thank you for your work and for addressing my previous DISCUSS ballot (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CkmRMfF6XpbAYuuS2Yp8EeHttqk/)

-éric
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2023-06-07 for -21) Not sent
Thank you to Ivaylo Petrov for the SECDIR review.
John Scudder Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -21) Unknown

                            
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -21) Not sent

                            
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -21) Not sent

                            
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-06-08 for -21) Sent
The SHOULDs in Section 7.1 don't give any guidance about why an implementer might legitimately decide to deviate from the advice given in each case.  It would be very helpful to make this clear.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-06-07 for -21) Sent
NIT:

      title=New Flags in GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV

The "title=" keyword leaked into the title
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-06-08 for -21) Sent
Thanks for this document, and in particular including the manageability considerations and a reference to where any related configuration should be found (in future).  Otherwise, no comments.

Regards,
Rob
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-06-07 for -21) Not sent
Thanks for working on this specification. I haven't find transport related issues in my review.