Ballot for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 21 and is now closed.
The SHOULDs in Section 7.1 don't give any guidance about why an implementer might legitimately decide to deviate from the advice given in each case. It would be very helpful to make this clear.
NIT: title=New Flags in GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV The "title=" keyword leaked into the title
Thank you to Ivaylo Petrov for the SECDIR review.
Thanks for working on this specification. I haven't find transport related issues in my review.
Thank you for your work and for addressing my previous DISCUSS ballot (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CkmRMfF6XpbAYuuS2Yp8EeHttqk/) -éric
Thanks for this document, and in particular including the manageability considerations and a reference to where any related configuration should be found (in future). Otherwise, no comments. Regards, Rob