%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-01, number = {draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp/01/}, author = {Zafar Ali and Siva Sivabalan and Clarence Filsfils and Robert Varga and Victor Lopez and Oscar Gonzalez de Dios and Xian Zhang}, title = {{Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for remote-initiated GMPLS LSP Setup}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2015, month = jul, day = 6, abstract = {Draft {[}I-D. draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp{]} specifies procedures that can be used for creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs in the active stateful PCE model. However, this specification focuses on MPLS networks, and does not cover remote instantiation of paths in GMPLS-controlled networks. This document complements {[}I-D. draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp{]} by addressing the requirements for remote-initiated GMPLS LSPs.}, }