%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18 instead of this revision. @techreport{ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06, number = {draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/}, author = {Mike Koldychev and Siva Sivabalan and Colby Barth and Shuping Peng and Hooman Bidgoli}, title = {{PCEP extension to support Segment Routing Policy Candidate Paths}}, pagetotal = 24, year = , month = , day = , abstract = {This document introduces a mechanism to specify a Segment Routing (SR) policy, as a collection of SR candidate paths. An SR policy is identified by \textless{}headend, color, endpoint\textgreater{} tuple. An SR policy can contain one or more candidate paths where each candidate path is identified in PCEP by its uniquely assigned PLSP-ID. This document proposes extension to PCEP to support association among candidate paths of a given SR policy. The mechanism proposed in this document is applicable to both MPLS and IPv6 data planes of SR.}, }