PCEP Extensions for LSP scheduling with stateful PCE
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-08

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (pce WG)
Last updated 2019-07-07
Replaces draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
PCE Working Group                                           H. Chen, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                 Futurewei
Intended status: Standards Track                          Y. Zhuang, Ed.
Expires: January 8, 2020                                           Q. Wu
                                                                  Huawei
                                                           D. Ceccarelli
                                                                Ericsson
                                                            July 7, 2019

          PCEP Extensions for LSP scheduling with stateful PCE
             draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-08

Abstract

   This document defines a set of extensions needed to the stateful Path
   Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP), so as to
   enable Labeled Switched Path (LSP) scheduling for path computation
   and LSP setup/deletion based on the actual network resource usage and
   the duration of a traffic service in a centralized network
   environment as stated in RFC 8413.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 8, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents

Chen, et al.             Expires January 8, 2020                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               LSP Scheduling                    July 2019

   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Motivation and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Procedures and Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  LSP Scheduling Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.2.  Support of LSP Scheduling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       4.2.1.  LSP Scheduling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       4.2.2.  Periodical LSP Scheduling . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     4.3.  Scheduled LSP creation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     4.4.  Scheduled LSP Modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     4.5.  Scheduled LSP activation and deletion . . . . . . . . . .  10
   5.  PCEP Objects and TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     5.1.  Stateful PCE Capability TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     5.2.  LSP Object  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       5.2.1.  SCHED-LSP-ATTRIBUTE TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       5.2.2.  SCHED-PD-LSP-ATTRIBUTE TLV  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   6.  The PCEP Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     6.1.  The PCRpt Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     6.2.  The PCUpd Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     6.3.  The PCInitiate Message  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     6.4.  The PCReq message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     6.5.  The PCRep Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     6.6.  The PCErr Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   8.  Manageability Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.1.  Control of Function and Policy  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.2.  Information and Data Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.3.  Liveness Detection and Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.4.  Verify Correct Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     8.5.  Requirements On Other Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
     8.6.  Impact On Network Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
Show full document text