Skip to main content

Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions for Usage with Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-13

Yes

(Deborah Brungard)

No Objection

(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Martin Vigoureux)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Roman Danyliw
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2019-04-12) Sent for earlier
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -12) Unknown

                            
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2019-04-19) Sent for earlier
Thank you for addressing my Discuss point!
Ignas Bagdonas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -12) Not sent

                            
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-04-04 for -12) Sent
Just a quick clarification question on fragmentation: I'm wondering if it is really necessary to define a fragmentation mechanism/bit for each object separately (e.g also RFC8306) or if it would be more appropriate to allocate one bit in the common header? Just asking as I'm really not an expert here...
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2019-04-09 for -12) Sent
* Section 7.2.

"The special value of all zeros for this TLV is used to refer to all paths pertaining to a particular PLSP-ID."

Can you clarify what fields are all zero? What would the length be?