Sign in
Version 5.13.0, 2015-03-25
Report a bug

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

No Objection
(was Discuss)
(was Discuss)
(was Discuss)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Summary: Needs a YES.

[Adrian Farrel]

Comment (2012-03-19 for -09)

Thank you for addressing my Discuss issues and Comments.

Note that the revised text in Section 5 (for which, thanks) is
missing blank lines between the paragraphs.

[Russ Housley]

Comment (2012-03-01 for -09)

The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 28-Feb-2012 included some
  editorial suggestions that deserve consideration

  (1) Section says:
  > ... full-functionality option in Section
  I think you meant "Section".  One other place in this
  paragraph needs this correction too.

  (2) Section 4.2 says:
  > The problem with 3-in-1 encoding is that the 10-codepoint does
  > not survive decapsulation with the tunneling options in
  > Section -
  Again, you meant -