Requirements for Signaling of Pre-Congestion Information in a Diffserv Domain
draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-08

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(David Harrington; former steering group member) Yes

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

Thanks for a clean sweep on my Discusses and Comments

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

A question for the responsible AD...

The PROTO writeup states:

      The -03 version generated significant debate on the working group
      mailing list during WGLC.  The editor addressed the comments
      to everyone's satisfaction.  There are no vocal dissenters.

Just curious: what were the topics that generated significant debate? It would be helpful to mention those in the ballot writeup.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

I just note that 5559 which is referenced here says "The signalling 
between the PCN-boundary-nodes must be protected from attacks."
So I'm counting on the eventual protocol document meeting that
goal.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection