Requirements for Signaling of Pre-Congestion Information in a Diffserv Domain
draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-08
Yes
(David Harrington)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
David Harrington Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-02-08)
Unknown
Thanks for a clean sweep on my Discusses and Comments
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-17)
Unknown
A question for the responsible AD...
The PROTO writeup states:
The -03 version generated significant debate on the working group
mailing list during WGLC. The editor addressed the comments
to everyone's satisfaction. There are no vocal dissenters.
Just curious: what were the topics that generated significant debate? It would be helpful to mention those in the ballot writeup.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-19)
Unknown
I just note that 5559 which is referenced here says "The signalling between the PCN-boundary-nodes must be protected from attacks." So I'm counting on the eventual protocol document meeting that goal.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown