%% You should probably cite rfc7843 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option/08/},
    author =    {Andreas Ripke and Rolf Winter and Thomas Dietz and Juergen Quittek and Rafael Lopez da Silva},
    title =     {{Port Control Protocol (PCP) Third-Party ID Option}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2016,
    month =     mar,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {This document describes a new Port Control Protocol (PCP) option called the THIRD\_PARTY\_ID option. It is designed to be used together with the THIRD\_PARTY option specified in RFC 6887. The THIRD\_PARTY\_ID option serves to identify a third party in situations where a third party's IP address contained in the THIRD\_PARTY option does not provide sufficient information to create requested mappings in a PCP-controlled device.},
}