PIM Assert Message Packing
draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (pim WG)
Authors Yisong Liu  , Mike McBride  , Toerless Eckert  , Zheng Zhang 
Last updated 2021-02-20
Replaces draft-liu-pim-assert-packing
Stream Internent Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
PIM Working Group                                            Yisong Liu
Internet Draft                                             China Mobile
Intended status: Standards Track                             M. McBride
Expires: August 21, 2021                                      T. Eckert
                                                              Futurewei
                                                               Z. Zhang
                                                                    ZTE
                                                           Feb 21, 2021

                        PIM Assert Message Packing
                     draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-01

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
   reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 21, 2021.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with

Liu, et al.              Expire August, 2021                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           PIM Assert Packing              February 2021

   respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
   document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
   Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
   warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Abstract

   In PIM-SM shared LAN networks, there is typically more than one
   upstream router. When duplicate data packets appear on the LAN from
   different routers, assert packets are sent from these routers to
   elect a single forwarder. The PIM assert packets are sent
   periodically to keep the assert state. The PIM assert packet carries
   information about a single multicast source and group, along with
   the metric-preference and metric of the route towards the source or
   RP. This document defines a standard to send and receive multiple
   multicast source and group information in a single PIM assert packet
   in a shared network. This can be particularly helpful when there is
   traffic for a large number of multicast groups.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ................................................ 3
      1.1. Requirements Language .................................. 3
      1.2. Terminology ............................................ 3
   2. Use Cases ................................................... 3
      2.1. Enterprise network ..................................... 4
      2.2. Video surveillance ..................................... 4
      2.3. Financial Services ..................................... 4
      2.4. IPTV broadcast Video ................................... 4
      2.5. Summary ................................................ 4
   3. Solution .................................................... 5
      3.1. PIM Assert Packing Hello Option ........................ 5
      3.2. PIM Assert Packing Simple Type ......................... 5
      3.3. PIM Assert Packing Aggregation Type .................... 6
      3.4. Assert Timer ........................................... 6
   4. Packet Format ............................................... 6
      4.1. PIM Assert Packing Hello Option ........................ 6
      4.2. PIM Assert Simple Packing Format ....................... 7
      4.3. PIM Assert Aggregation Packing Format .................. 8
   5. IANA Considerations ........................................ 11
   6. Security Considerations .................................... 11
   7. References ................................................. 12
      7.1. Normative References .................................. 12
      7.2. Informative References ................................ 12
   8. Acknowledgments ............................................ 12
   Authors' Addresses ............................................ 13
Show full document text