Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
draft-ietf-pim-dm-new-v2-05
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
From OPS Directorate (Pekka): One question/comment: 6. IANA Considerations 6.1. PIM Address Family 6.2. PIM Hello Options ==> this specification defines PIM AF/Hello options which affect all the PIM protocols (including PIM-SM). Is this the appropriate place to do so (at least, if it is, I guess it should be explicitly called out in the section, and noted in the other PIM specs as well..)? At least, the PIM-SM revised spec includes about the same text again -- you can't do the allocations twice, at least.. :-) nits: - split refs - add ipr etc. sections
(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection
Nits: No copyright or IPR boilerplate, references need separating
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection
Since when is set union non-commutativ (section 2.2)? If it is non-commutative here, it shouldn't be called set union, or the reason for the difference should be explained. The IPsec section of the security considerations is quite vague; it doesn't really say what has to be supported. It also doesn't take msec into account.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection