Skip to main content

PIM Group-to-Rendezvous-Point Mapping
draft-ietf-pim-group-rp-mapping-10

Yes

(Dan Romascanu)

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2010-12-31) Unknown
Routing Area Directorate review by Dimitri Papadimitriou raises a few very minor editorial points that should be looked at together with any other comments and issues raised during IESG review.

> Section 1: 
> 
> - "Each PIM-SM router may learn Group-to-RP mappings through
>    various mechanisms." which mechanisms ? ref's would be helpful
> 
> - "It is critical that each router select the same 'RP' for a specific
>    multicast group address." why ? a short sentence would be helpful
>    - note this requirement applies to al routers in the same "domain"
> 
> Section 4:
> 
> - "A Group-to-RP mapping learned for PIM-BIDIR mode is preferred to
>    an entry learned for PIM-SM mode."
>    is this reason dictated by arbitrary criteria or protocol operation 
>    criteria (dictated by RFC 5059) or other ?
> 
> Section 5: 
> 
> - Add ref's to BSR and Auto-RP in sentence
>   "In this case, to support some specific applications, they might like to
>    learn Group-to-RP mappings dynamically using either BSR or Auto-RP
>    mechanism."
> 
> - "This is not an issue for IPv6 Multicast address ranges." what "this" 
>    refers to ?
> 
> Section 6:
> 
> - What's the input to this algorithm ? there is a need to describe the set
>   of information onto which this procedure applies (the output is implicit).
> 
> - The description seems to mandate a sequential execution (from 1 to
>    10) but this is not stated ahead in the Section 6.
> 
> Section 9:
> 
> - " The algorithm in this document MUST be used. " on all routers in 
>   the domain? Please clarify. 
> 
> - "improve stability under misconfiguration" stability of what ? 
> 
> Section 11:
> 
> - does the term "block" refers to disable or filter ? or left unspecified ?
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss) Yes
Yes (2011-01-16) Unknown

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown