Ballot for draft-ietf-pim-light
Yes
No Objection
No Record
Summary: Needs 2 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-pim-light-10 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Nits ### S3.4 * "out going interface (OIF)" -> "outgoing interface (OIF)"
DOWNREF [RFC6559] from this Proposed Standard to Experimental RFC6559. (For IESG discussion. It seems this DOWNREF was not mentioned in the Last Call and also seems to not appear in the DOWNREF registry.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. Section 3.2.2, paragraph 1 > wn stream BIER edge router, it can be send over the BIER tunnel to the upstre > ^^^^^^^ There may an error in the verb form "be send". Section 3.2.3, paragraph 2 > more BIER edge routers in a BIER sub-domain [draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling]. > ^^^^^^^^^^ This word is normally spelled as one. Section 3.2.3, paragraph 2 > nding multicast streams until the out going interface (OIF) expires. Other p > ^^^^^^^^^ The word "outgoing" is spelled as one word. Section 3.4, paragraph 3 > d for determining which peer is doing a active transport open to the neighbor > ^ Use "an" instead of "a" if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. "an article", "an hour". Section 3.5, paragraph 2 > ensures only Join/Prune messages arriving on a configured PLI are processed. > ^^^^^^^^^^^ The usual preposition after "arriving" is "at", not "on". Did you mean "arriving at"?
Thank you to Mallory Knodel for the GENART review.
Thanks, Hooman, for quickly addressing my previous DISCUSS ballot (and the associated COMMENTs). See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/az5rGUZvVOW9_WNXA4jiPEWy2vI/