PIM NULL Register packing
draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-00
Network Working Group V. Kamath
Internet-Draft VMware
Intended status: Standards Track R. Chokkanathapuram Sundaram
Expires: April 22, 2019 Cisco Systems, Inc.
October 19, 2018
PIM NULL Register packing
draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-00
Abstract
In PIM-SM networks PIM registers are sent from the first hop router
to the RP (Rendezvous Point) to signal the presence of Multicast
source in the network.There are periodic PIM Null registers sent from
first hop router to the RP to keep the state alive at the RP as long
as the source is active. The PIM null register packet carry
information about a single Multicast source and group. This document
defines a standard to send multiple Multicast source and group
information in a single pim null register packet and the
interoperability between the PIM routers which do not understand the
packet format with multiple Multicast source and group details.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 22, 2019.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Kamath & ChokkanathapuramExpiresaApril 22, 2019 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft PIM NULL Register packing October 2018
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. PIM Register Stop format with capability option . . . . . . . 3
3. New PIM Null register format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. New Packed PIM Register Stop format . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Protocol operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
PIM Null registers are sent by First hop routers periodically for
Multicast streams to keep the states active on the RP as long as the
Multicast source is alive. As the number of multicast sources
increase, the number of PIM null register packets that are sent
increases at a given time. This results in more PIM packet
processing at RP and FHR. The control plane policing(COPP), monitors
the packets that gets processed by the control plane. Due to the
high rate at which NULL registers are received at the RP, this can
lead to COPP drops of Multicast PIM null register packets. This
draft proposes a method to efficiently pack multiple PIM null
registers and register stop into a single message as these packets
anyway don't contain data. The draft also proposes interoperability
with the routers that do not understand the new packet format.
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Kamath & ChokkanathapuramExpiresaApril 22, 2019 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft PIM NULL Register packing October 2018
Show full document text