Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES.
Comment (2011-11-01 for -)
- Presumably if this experiment is a success then some method of
doing automated key management would be required for a successor
standards track document. I think just noting that in the
security considerations section would be good.
- I wondered why TLS wasn't considered as an additional option.
Be good to explain why, esp if there's a reason it wouldn't work
Comment (2011-11-02 for -)
s3.1 and s3.2: Not being a PIM expert, I tripped up over how IPv6 addresses
could fit in to TCP Connection ID and SCTP Connection ID. I kind of had to
guess where I'd find more information about this, so a pointer to the xoring
mechanism in RFC 4061 would have helped a lot.