An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization
draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-05
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Tim Polk)
No Objection
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
Recuse
(Russ Housley)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2009-04-27)
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-04-20)
Unknown
s/IPSec/IPsec/ x2
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-04-20)
Unknown
The diff between this and 3281 is pretty simple. The deletion of this sentence (near the end of page 32 of 3281 update) sticks out on casual inspection: "In this case, the digestedObjectType MUST be publicKey and the otherObjectTypeID field MUST NOT be present." I wanted to shine the light on it to make sure its deletion was intentional.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown