%% You should probably cite rfc6402 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis/08/},
    author =    {Jim Schaad},
    title =     {{Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates}},
    pagetotal = 37,
    year =      2011,
    month =     sep,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {This document contains a set of updates to the base syntax for CMC, a Certificate Management protocol using the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS). This document updates RFC 5272, RFC 5273, and RFC 5274. The new items in this document are: new controls for future work in doing server side key generation, definition of a Subject Information Access value to identify CMC servers, and the registration of a port number for TCP/IP for the CMC service to run on. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}