Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithms and Identifiers for DSA and ECDSA
draft-ietf-pkix-sha2-dsa-ecdsa-10
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 5758.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel R. L. Brown , Tim Polk , Stefan Santesson , Kathleen Moriarty , Quynh Dang | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2009-10-07) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 5758 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Pasi Eronen | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-pkix-sha2-dsa-ecdsa-10
PKIX Working Group Q. Dang (NIST)
Internet Draft S. Santesson
Intended Category: Standards Track 3xA Security (AAA-sec.com)
K. Moriarty(RSA)
D. Brown (Certicom Corp.)
T. Polk (NIST)
October 07, 2009
Expires: April 07, 2010
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithms and
Identifiers for DSA and ECDSA
<draft-ietf-pkix-sha2-dsa-ecdsa-10.txt>
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 07, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your
rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
Abstract
This document updates RFC 3279 to specify algorithm
identifiers and ASN.1 encoding rules for the Digital Signature
Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
(ECDSA) digital signatures when using SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384
or SHA-512 as hashing algorithm. This specification applies to
the Internet X.509 Public Key infrastructure (PKI) when digital
signatures are used to sign certificates and certificate
revocation lists(CRLs). This document also identifies all four
SHA2 hash algorithms for use in the Internet X.509 PKI.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.............................................2
2. Hash Functions...........................................3
3. Signature Algorithms.....................................3
3.1 DSA Signature Algorithm.................................4
3.2 ECDSA Signature Algorithm...............................4
4. ASN.1 Module.............................................5
5. Security Considerations..................................6
6. References...............................................6
6.1 Normative references: ..................................6
6.2 Informative references: ................................7
7. Authors' Addresses.......................................7
8. IANA Considerations......................................8
9. Acknowledgement..........................................8
1. Introduction
This specification defines the contents of the
signatureAlgorithm, signatureValue and signature fields within
Internet X.509 certificates and CRLs when these objects are
signed using DSA or ECDSA with a SHA2 hash algorithm. These
fields are more fully described in RFC 5280 [RFC 5280]. This
document also identifies all four SHA2 hash algorithms for use
in the Internet X.509 PKI.
This document profiles material presented in the "Secure Hash
Standard" [FIPS 180-3], "Public Key Cryptography for the
Financial Services Industry: The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature
Standard (ECDSA)" [X9.62], and the "Digital Signature
Standard" [FIPS 186-3].
This document updates RFC 3279 [RFC 3279] sections 2.1, 2.2.2, and
2.2.3. Note that RFC 5480 [RFC 5480] updates sections 2.3.5, 3
(ASN.1 Module) and 5 (Security Considerations) of RFC 3279.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC 2119].
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
2. Hash Functions
This section identifies four additional hash algorithms for use
with DSA and ECDSA in the Internet X.509 certificate and CRL
profile [RFC 5280]. SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512
produce a 224-bit, 256-bit, 384-bit and 512-bit "hash" of the
input respectively and are fully described in the Federal
Information Processing Standard 180-3 [FIPS 180-3].
The listed one-way hash functions are identified by the following
object identifiers (OIDs):
id-sha224 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-itu-t(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
nistalgorithm(4) hashalgs(2) 4 }
id-sha256 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-itu-t(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
nistalgorithm(4) hashalgs(2) 1 }
id-sha384 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-itu-t(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
nistalgorithm(4) hashalgs(2) 2 }
id-sha512 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-itu-t(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
nistalgorithm(4) hashalgs(2) 3 }
When one of these OIDs appears in an AlgorithmIdentifier, all
implementations MUST accept both NULL and absent parameters as
legal and equivalent encodings.
Conforming CA implementations SHOULD use SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384
or SHA-512 when generating certificates or CRLs, but MAY use SHA-1
if they have a stated policy that requires the use of this weaker
algorithm.
3. Signature Algorithms
This section identifies OIDs for DSA with SHA-224 and SHA-256 as
well as ECDSA with SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512. The contents
of the parameters component for each signature algorithm vary; details
are provided for each algorithm.
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
3.1 DSA Signature Algorithm
The DSA is defined in the Digital Signature Standard (DSS) [FIPS
186-3]. DSA was developed by the U.S. Government, and can be used
in conjunction with a SHA2 hash function such as SHA-224
or SHA-256. DSA is fully described in [FIPS 186-3].
When SHA-224 is used, the OID is:
id-dsa-with-sha224 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-ccitt(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
algorithms(4) id-dsa-with-sha2(3) 1 }.
When SHA-256 is used, the OID is:
id-dsa-with-sha256 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { joint-iso-ccitt(2)
country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101) csor(3)
algorithms(4) id-dsa-with-sha2(3) 2 }.
When the id-dsa-with-sha224 or id-dsa-with-sha256 algorithm
identifier appears in the algorithm field as an
AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding SHALL omit the parameters field.
That is, the AlgorithmIdentifier SHALL be a SEQUENCE of one
component, the OID id-dsa-with-sha224 or id-dsa-with-sha256.
Encoding rules for DSA signature values are specified in [RFC
3279].
Conforming CA implementations that generate DSA signatures for
certificates or CRLs MUST generate such DSA signatures in
accordance with all the requirements in Sections 4.1, 4.5 and 4.6
of [FIPS 186-3].
Conforming CA implementations that generate DSA signatures for
certificates or CRLs MAY generate such DSA signatures in
accordance with all the requirements and recommendations in [FIPS
186-3], if they have a stated policy that requires conformance to
[FIPS 186-3].
3.2 ECDSA Signature Algorithm
The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is defined
in "Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry:
The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Standard (ECDSA)" [X9.62].
The ASN.1 OIDs used to specify that an ECDSA signature was
generated using SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 or SHA-512 are
respectively:
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
ecdsa-with-SHA224 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
us(840) ansi-X9-62(10045) signatures(4) ecdsa-with-SHA2(3) 1 }
ecdsa-with-SHA256 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
us(840) ansi-X9-62(10045) signatures(4) ecdsa-with-SHA2(3) 2 }
ecdsa-with-SHA384 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
us(840) ansi-X9-62(10045) signatures(4) ecdsa-with-SHA2(3) 3 }
ecdsa-with-SHA512 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
us(840) ansi-X9-62(10045) signatures(4) ecdsa-with-SHA2(3) 4 }
When the ecdsa-with-SHA224, ecdsa-with-SHA256, ecdsa-with-SHA384
or ecdsa-with-SHA512 algorithm identifier appears in the algorithm
field as an AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding MUST omit the
parameters field. That is, the AlgorithmIdentifier SHALL be a
SEQUENCE of one component, the OID ecdsa-with-SHA224, ecdsa-with-
SHA256, ecdsa-with-SHA384 or ecdsa-with-SHA512.
Conforming CA implementations MUST specify the hash algorithm
explicitly using the OIDs specified above when encoding
ECDSA/SHA2 signatures in certificates and CRLs.
Conforming client implementations that process ECDSA signatures
with any of the SHA2 hash algorithms when processing certificates
and CRLs MUST recognize the corresponding OIDs specified above.
Encoding rules for ECDSA signature values are specified in RFC 3279
[RFC 3279] Section 2.2.3 and RFC 5480 [RFC 5480].
Conforming CA implementations that generate ECDSA signatures in
certificates or CRLs MUST generate such ECDSA signatures in
accordance with all the requirements specified in Sections 7.2 and
7.3 of [X9.62] or with all the requirements specified in Section
4.1.3 of [SEC1].
Conforming CA implementations that ECDSA signatures in
certificates or CRLs MAY generate such ECDSA signatures in
accordance with all the requirements and recommendations in
[X9.62] or [SEC1] if they have a stated policy that requires
conformance to [X9.62] or [SEC1].
4. ASN.1 Module
The OIDs of the SHA2 hash algorithms are in the RFC 4055 [RFC 4055]
ASN.1 module and the OIDs for DSA with SHA-224 and SHA-256 as well
as ECDSA with SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 and SHA-512 are defined
in the RFC 5480 [RFC 5480] ASN.1 module.
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
5. Security Considerations
NIST has defined appropriate use of the hash functions in terms of
the algorithm strengths and expected time frames for secure use in
Special Publications (SPs) 800-78-1 [SP 800-78-1], 800-57 [SP 800-
57] and 800-107 [SP 800-107]. These documents can be used as
guides to choose appropriate key sizes for various security
scenarios.
ANSI also provides security considerations for ECDSA in [X9.62].
These security considerations may be used as a guide.
6. References
6.1 Normative references:
[RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to
Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC 3279] Bassham, L., Polk, W., and R. Housley, "Algorithms
and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate
Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 3279, April
2002.
[RFC 4055] Schaad, J., Kaliski, B., and Housley, R.,"Additional
Algorithms and Identifiers for RSA Cryptography for
use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL)
Profile", RFC 4055, June 2005.
[RFC 5480] Turner, S., Brown D., Yiu K., Housley R.,and Polk,T.,
"Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
Information", RFC 5480, March 2009.
[RFC 5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public
Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate
Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.
[FIPS 180-3] Federal Information Processing Standards
Publication (FIPS PUB) 180-3, Secure Hash Standard
(SHS), October 2008.
[FIPS 186-3] Federal Information Processing Standards
Publication (FIPS PUB) 186-3, Digital Signature
Standard (DSS), June 2009.
[SEC1] Standards for Efficient Cryptography SEC 1:
Elliptic Curve Cryptography, Version 2.0, 2009.
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
[X9.62] X9.62-2005, "Public Key Cryptography for the
Financial Services Industry: The Elliptic Curve
Digital Signature Standard (ECDSA)", November,
2005.
6.2 Informative references:
[SP 800-107] Quynh Dang, NIST, "Recommendation for Applications
Using Approved Hash Algorithms", February 2009.
[SP 800-78-1] W. Timothy Polk, Donna, F. Dodson, William E.
Burr, NIST, "Cryptographic Standards and Key Sizes
for Personal Identity Verification", August 2007.
[SP 800-57] Elaine Barker, William Barker, William E. Burr,
NIST, "Recommendation for Key Management", August
2005.
7. Authors' addresses
Quynh Dang
NIST
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930
USA
Email: quynh.dang@nist.gov
Stefan Santesson
3xA Security (AAA-sec.com)
Bjornstorp 744
247 98 Genarp
Sweden
EMail: sts@aaa-sec.com
Kathleen M. Moriarty
RSA, The Security Division of EMC
174 Middlesex Turnpike
Bedford, MA 01730
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft DSA/ECDSA October 07, 2009
Email: Moriarty_Kathleen@emc.com
Daniel R. L. Brown
Certicom Corp.
5520 Explorer Drive
Mississaug, ON L4W 5L1
Email: dbrown@certicom.com
Tim Polk
NIST
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930
USA
Email: tim.polk@nist.gov
8. IANA Considerations
This document has no actions for IANA.
9. Acknowledgement
Authors of this document would like to acknowledge great inputs
for this document from Alfred Hoenes, Sean Turner, Katrin Hoeper
and many others from IETF community. The authors also appreciate
many great revision suggestions from Russ Housley and Paul
Hoffman.
Dang, et al. Expires April 07, 2010 [Page 8]