%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-14 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-07,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers/07/},
    author =    {Aritra Banerjee and Tirumaleswar Reddy.K and Dimitrios Schoinianakis and Tim Hollebeek and Mike Ounsworth},
    title =     {{Post-Quantum Cryptography for Engineers}},
    pagetotal = 46,
    year =      2025,
    month =     jan,
    day =       24,
    abstract =  {The advent of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) would render state-of-the-art, traditional public-key algorithms deployed today obsolete, as the mathematical assumptions underpinning their security would no longer hold. To address this, protocols and infrastructure must transition to post-quantum algorithms, which are designed to resist both traditional and quantum attacks. This document explains why engineers need to be aware of and understand post-quantum cryptography (PQC), detailing the impact of CRQCs on existing systems and the challenges involved in transitioning to post-quantum algorithms. Unlike previous cryptographic updates, this shift may require significant protocol redesign due to the unique properties of post-quantum algorithms.},
}