%% You should probably cite rfc9794 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid-terminology/00/},
    author =    {Flo D},
    title =     {{Terminology for Post-Quantum Traditional Hybrid Schemes}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {One aspect of the transition to post-quantum algorithms in cryptographic protocols is the development of hybrid schemes that incorporate both post-quantum and traditional asymmetric algorithms. This document defines terminology for such schemes. It is intended to be used as a reference and, hopefully, to ensure consistency and clarity across different protocols, standards, and organisations. About This Document This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pquip-pqt-hybrid/.},
}