IETF Problem Resolution Process
draft-ietf-problem-process-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2004-04-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-04-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-04-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-04-27
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-27
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | RFC Editor note added to writeup: Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/ Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- … RFC Editor note added to writeup: Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/ Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/ Section 7: s/security- related/security-related/ |
2004-04-16
|
04 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 |
2004-04-15
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-15
|
04 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
2004-04-15
|
04 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2004-04-15
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-15
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot comment] Although I wrote large parts of this document (and have therefore recused myself from the ballot), I do wonder about the utility of … [Ballot comment] Although I wrote large parts of this document (and have therefore recused myself from the ballot), I do wonder about the utility of publishing this document, as we never acheived WG consensus on the contents... |
2004-04-14
|
04 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-04-14
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-04-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/ Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/ Section 7: … [Ballot comment] Please delete sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. Section 4.6: s/four major areas/five major areas/ Section 5.1.1: s/non-tools- related/non-tools-related/ Section 7: s/security- related/security-related/ I would like to see Section 7 point out that improved cooperation between WGs and across areas could lead to improved security in IETF standards. |
2004-04-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-04-13
|
04 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
2004-04-06
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from Waiting for Writeup by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Ballot has been issued by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-05
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-01-28
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Last Call was requested by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-01-14
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-01-14
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-01-14
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | State Change Notice email list have been change to mshore@cisco.com, avri@acm.org from |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Note from the WG Chairs: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt has completed WG last call and is ready for review by the IESG for publication as an informational RFC. … Note from the WG Chairs: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt has completed WG last call and is ready for review by the IESG for publication as an informational RFC. There were several strong objections to publication of the draft, but not sufficient, in our opinion, to overcome the broader agreement within the working group. The objections were: 1) the document is not comprehensive (i.e. does not include all of the comments that were received on it, and 2) the document does not reflect the consensus of the working group. However, because we agreed at the time the working group was getting started that the documents could not be comprehensive, because the concern about consensus on document contents reflects a misunderstanding about the intention of the document, and because there was otherwise agreement about publishing the document, we felt the issues raised were not sufficient to block forwarding the document to the IESG for review. Because the document does have implications for the entire organization and because it is contentious, we would like to request IETF last call, as well. Melinda |
2004-01-14
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | Draft Added by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-01-12
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-04.txt |
2003-11-03
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-03.txt |
2003-09-02
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-02.txt |
2003-07-03
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-01.txt |
2003-05-12
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-problem-process-00.txt |