Update of the Pseudowire Control-Word Negotiation Mechanism
draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from pwe3-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation@ietf.org to (None)
2012-09-06
05 (System) RFC published
2012-07-26
05 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-07-25
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2012-07-25
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-07-25
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-07-25
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-07-25
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-07-25
05 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-07-25
05 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup was changed
2012-07-14
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing all my Discuss and Comment points
2012-07-14
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-05
05 Elwyn Davies Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Elwyn Davies.
2012-07-02
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-07-02
05 Lizhong Jin New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-05.txt
2012-06-21
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-06-21
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
This is non-blocking:

To start, realize that I am NOT well versed in PWE3 technology, and please tell me if what I'm asking …
2012-06-21
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-21
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-21
04 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-21
04 Stewart Bryant
The Documnet Shepherd provided the following clarification concerning his evaluation of consensus:

My statement in the writeup was based for the most part on reaction …
2012-06-21
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-06-21
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
To start, realize that I am NOT well versed in PWE3 technology, and please tell me if what I'm asking about would simply …
2012-06-21
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
This is non-blocking:
I *very* much appreciate and applaud the work done by our non-native-speaking colleagues.  With that in mind, I strongly suggest …
2012-06-21
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-06-21
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-20
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-06-20
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]

  The Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies on 19-Jun-2012 says:
  >
  > Not ready. The proposal for the NOT PREFERRED to …
2012-06-20
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-06-19
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
General: If this draft is about generic renegotiation it should just say that ;)

This is just word smthing:

(section:change - a=abstract)

- …
2012-06-19
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-19
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I'm confused is this a generic control word renegotiation mechanism (I think it is) or is it just to change from preferred to …
2012-06-19
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
This is just word smthing:

(section:change - a=abstract)

- a and s1:

OLD:

The control word negotiation mechanism specified in RFC4447 has a …
2012-06-19
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-06-19
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-06-19
04 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-18
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
(Edit to remove piece of Discuss related to process)

The Abstract could usefully say that this document updates both 4447
and 6073.

The …
2012-06-18
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot discuss text updated for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-18
04 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-06-18
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I support Adrian's DISCUSS position on the process used to advance this document.
2012-06-18
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-06-18
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-06-18
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- Adrian's process questions in his discuss seem reasonable to me,
as does the question about how this updates 6073.

- PE could …
2012-06-18
04 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-06-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
(Edit to remove a piece of stray text)

The Abstract could usefully say that this document updates both 4447
and 6073.

The Introduction …
2012-06-17
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot discuss text updated for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
The Abstract could usefully say that this document updates both 4447
and 6073.

The Introduction talks of updating 4447 but does not mention …
2012-06-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Please s/draft/document/

---

Please request the RFC Editor to not split Appendix A across a page
break.

---

Please capitalise all mesage names …
2012-06-17
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-15
04 Stewart Bryant Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-21
2012-06-15
04 Stewart Bryant Ballot has been issued
2012-06-15
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-06-15
04 Stewart Bryant Created "Approve" ballot
2012-06-15
04 Lizhong Jin New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04.txt
2012-06-15
03 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-06-13
03 Stewart Bryant A RTG DIR review came in that the authors need to look at before the IESG review the document.

2012-06-13
03 Stewart Bryant Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-06-13
03 Stewart Bryant Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-21
2012-06-13
03 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-07
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2012-06-07
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2012-06-05
03 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-03, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are …
2012-06-01
03 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <pwe3@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-03.txt> (Pseudowire Control …
2012-06-01
03 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-06-01
03 Stewart Bryant Last call was requested
2012-06-01
03 Stewart Bryant Ballot approval text was generated
2012-06-01
03 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup was generated
2012-06-01
03 Stewart Bryant State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-06-01
03 Stewart Bryant Last call announcement was generated
2012-05-14
03 Stewart Bryant State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-05-14
03 Andy Malis IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2012-05-11
03 Amy Vezza
Document Writeup for draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-03

As required by RFC 4858 </rfc/rfc4858.txt>, this is the current template
for the Document Shepherd Write-Up.

Changes are expected over time. …
2012-05-11
03 Andy Malis Submitted to IESG for publication
2012-05-11
03 Amy Vezza Note added 'Andrew Malis (amalis@gmail.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-05-11
03 Amy Vezza Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-05-11
03 Amy Vezza IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-05-11
03 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-jin-pwe3-cbit-negotiation
2012-05-09
03 Andy Malis IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2012-04-23
03 Andy Malis Completed WG last call
2012-04-23
03 Andy Malis WG last call is for two weeks, ending on 7 May 2012.
2012-04-23
03 Andy Malis Changed shepherd to Andrew Malis
2012-04-23
03 Andy Malis IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2012-04-13
03 Andy Malis Started two-week WG last call.
2012-04-13
03 Raymond Key New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-03.txt
2011-10-19
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-02.txt
2011-07-06
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-01.txt
2011-04-15
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-00.txt